Christian K - Pre-Screening request

[Christian K]

Thanks - would this re-edit be more acceptable ?

Regards,
Christian

[dlowwa]

Thanks - would this re-edit be more acceptable ?

Regards,
Christian

Very soft, and borderline contrast.

[Christian K]

Thanks - will skip that one then.

Can you please have a look at these two busines jets landing at Zürich today ? Contrast ? Angle ? Over-processed ?

1) Cessna
2) Embraer

Thanks,
Christian

[dlowwa]

Thanks - will skip that one then.

Can you please have a look at these two busines jets landing at Zürich today ? Contrast ? Angle ? Over-processed ?

1) Cessna
2) Embraer

Thanks,
Christian

Would be rejected for dark/contrast, soft, centering, and overprocessed.

[Christian K]

Thanks dlowwa,

I made some changes to the eddid (adding subtle structure and contrast [hoping to avoid overprocessing] and hope this looks better now. One thing was rotating both planes back to the angle in the original photo, in order to get rid of jaggies.

Regards and have a good weekend,
Christian

[dlowwa]

Thanks dlowwa,

I made some changes to the eddid (adding subtle structure and contrast [hoping to avoid overprocessing] and hope this looks better now. One thing was rotating both planes back to the angle in the original photo, in order to get rid of jaggies.

Regards and have a good weekend,
Christian

Centering is better, but all other issues remain.

[Christian K]

Thanks for the quick turn-around. I dare saying that I struggle with the "overprocessed". I cannot see clear signs of overprocessing (e.g. halos). Can you please give me a hint ? That would help me adding contrast and reducing the softness, which might potentiate signs of overprocessing.

Thanks again,
Christian

[dlowwa]

Thanks for the quick turn-around. I dare saying that I struggle with the "overprocessed". I cannot see clear signs of overprocessing (e.g. halos). Can you please give me a hint ?

There are editing halos visible. WIthout knowing what is causing them, I can't say what needs to be done to prevent them.

[Christian K]

I have worked on the Cessna (potential Hot-Photo as there is no picture yet of the new registration (it was recently re-registered) on JetPhotos. I hope the halos (e.g. above the turbine ?) are now better, as I am afraid that if I go down further with structure and contrast the picture become too soft.

Regards,
Christian

[dlowwa]

I have worked on the Cessna (potential Hot-Photo as there is no picture yet of the new registration (it was recently re-registered) on JetPhotos. I hope the halos (e.g. above the turbine ?) are now better, as I am afraid that if I go down further with structure and contrast the picture become too soft.

Regards,
Christian

Image would be rejected for dark, soft, and overprocessed.

[Christian K]

Hello,

Can you please have a look at these two immages of a Finnair A350, taken seconds appart at Zürich airport last November:

Regarding the first one - I know it is not horizontally centered as generally required, but I'd rather have the full tower on it than cut the top of - would this be a reason for rejetion ?

Any other comments (light, contrast, processing) ?

Regards,
Christian

[LX-A343]

Hello,

Can you please have a look at these two immages of a Finnair A350, taken seconds appart at Zürich airport last November:

Regarding the first one - I know it is not horizontally centered as generally required, but I'd rather have the full tower on it than cut the top of - would this be a reason for rejetion ?

Any other comments (light, contrast, processing) ?

Regards,
Christian

They would be rejected for too similar. Pick one of them.

[Christian K]

Thank you. I am aware of the similarity rule. My favourite photo is the one with the tower, but I am afraid that it might be rejected straight away for bad centeting. If this is not the case, may I ask you to comment on the first photo (with the tower).

[dlowwa]

Thank you. I am aware of the similarity rule. My favourite photo is the one with the tower, but I am afraid that it might be rejected straight away for bad centeting. If this is not the case, may I ask you to comment on the first photo (with the tower).

Both would be rejected for centering.

[Christian K]

Thanks,

any thoughts about this SWISS A340? It was a crisp early sunny morning and I did hardly apply any editing. So I am wondering if there is any sign of over-processing ?

Thanks,
Christian