Originally posted by sharksfan166269
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
sharksfan166269 - prescreening/Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Would be rejected for soft/blurry, color (visible purple fringing), and overprocessed (editing halos).
Comment
-
Originally posted by sharksfan166269 View Post
Do you know how to reduce/remove the purple fringing? I've noticed this a lot in most of my photos and I've managed to get rid of most of it in Photoshop, but still appears.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Yep, just learned that at 300mm, this lens is quite prone to chromatic aberration and not being too sharp, so I've tried to shoot not wide open (f/8 - 9), as well as at the fastest shutter speed - 1/4000 to try increase sharpness and decrease CA. Not too sure it worked, but would appreciate a screen on these.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sharksfan166269 View PostYep, just learned that at 300mm, this lens is quite prone to chromatic aberration and not being too sharp, so I've tried to shoot not wide open (f/8 - 9), as well as at the fastest shutter speed - 1/4000 to try increase sharpness and decrease CA. Not too sure it worked, but would appreciate a screen on these.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sharksfan166269 View PostThank you for your feedback, I've reduced the noise and sharpened the aircraft a little more - are these any better?
Comment
-
Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
Sharpening is better, but they have a slight plastic like look, as if you tried to reduce noise too much.
Comment
-
-
Thank you for your feedback. I've gone back and re-edited, this time without touching highlights or shadows as well as making sure I exported in the highest quality, hopefully I've managed to avoid editing halos here.
I also wanted to ask, if I was to quickly upload an image and check the image with the "check for dust" tool, would that be a good way to also check for editing halos?
Comment
-
Originally posted by sharksfan166269 View PostThank you for your feedback. I've gone back and re-edited
2. soft, compression
4. noisy, overprocessed
3. noisy, overprocessed, borderline manipulation - bad masking job of the sky (see the area between the wing and fuselage which has been edited differently than the rest of the sk). This could be considered 'sky replacement' by some and get you a warning/ban if repeated. Be very careful with this type of editing.
Originally posted by sharksfan166269 View PostI also wanted to ask, if I was to quickly upload an image and check the image with the "check for dust" tool, would that be a good way to also check for editing halos?
Originally posted by sharksfan166269 View PostHello, I would appreciate if I could get a pre-screen on this image -
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
3. noisy, overprocessed, borderline manipulation - bad masking job of the sky (see the area between the wing and fuselage which has been edited differently than the rest of the sk). This could be considered 'sky replacement' by some and get you a warning/ban if repeated. Be very careful with this type of editing.
Overprocessed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sharksfan166269 View Post
Thank you for your feedback. I just wanted to clarify - if I was to select a certain area, like I (sloppily) selected just the sky here, and applied a filter, like sharpening, or de-noise as I did in #3, would that count as sky replacement or manipulation? I ask since I have seen tutorials/advice online where some have selected just the plane and sharpened, and I've mistakenly gone ahead and assumed de-noise would be okay. Apologies if it's not.
Comment
-
Once again, thank you. I'll try stay away from that, definitely don't want to get in any trouble here.
I've also re-edited another picture of N931WN, would appreciate a pre-screen on this. I've made sure to not touch highlights shadows, vibrance, or clarity, as well as checking the image with the "check for dust" tool, hopefully no overproccesing editing halos
Comment
Comment