Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kamryn - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
    Hello, would this be okay for screening?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N927NK-s-focus.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	573.6 KB
ID:	1117010
    Looks a bit dark.

    Comment


    • #92
      Thinking about submitting this one

      Click image for larger version

Name:	6C7899A9-8A5B-4F01-90F3-BDA369A2.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	448.0 KB
ID:	1117486

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
        Thinking about submitting this one

        Click image for larger version

Name:	6C7899A9-8A5B-4F01-90F3-BDA369A2.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	448.0 KB
ID:	1117486
        Bit dark, and natural effect or filter on the sky?

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

          Bit dark, and natural effect or filter on the sky?
          It's a natural effect but it looks like a filter, I'll probably add a light gradient for the upper part of the image.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Kamryn View Post

            It's a natural effect but it looks like a filter, I'll probably add a light gradient for the upper part of the image.
            Nah, I wouldn't add any filter, too much chance it might get caught and interpreted as manipulation. Just brighten it a bit, that's all.

            Comment


            • #96
              Taken with an iPhone 12 Pro. Not entirely sure if it'll be high enough quality for JP.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	C5EFACF1-4ED0-4FC9-B752-5D0AEFB3.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	543.5 KB
ID:	1117629
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
                Taken with an iPhone 12 Pro. Not entirely sure if it'll be high enough quality for JP.
                There are issues with oversharpening and compression.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  There are issues with oversharpening and compression.
                  Thank you, in addition, would I be able to upload this photo of the cockpit? It's in the same registration, but a different location and viewpoint. I get confused.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	N474CP-CP.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	528.1 KB
ID:	1117633

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Kamryn View Post

                    Thank you, in addition, would I be able to upload this photo of the cockpit? It's in the same registration, but a different location and viewpoint. I get confused.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	N474CP-CP.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	528.1 KB
ID:	1117633
                    If you are asking whether it would be considered similar to the one above, it would not - but it would not be accepted due to quality issues.

                    Comment


                    • Wondering if this warbird would be accepted.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	6DD8D57B-4B94-498B-9EA9-8A7F143F.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	561.2 KB
ID:	1118643

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
                        Wondering if this warbird would be accepted.
                        Image is soft and unlevel, so it is unlikely.

                        Comment


                        • Got a few photos from KVCV. Is this alright? My main concern would be the fence at the top right and bottom left. Not sure if that would be acceptable even after looking through the guidelines.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	VP-CVF-2-2-s-focus.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	545.7 KB
ID:	1118706

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
                            Got a few photos from KVCV. Is this alright? My main concern would be the fence at the top right and bottom left. Not sure if that would be acceptable even after looking through the guidelines.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	VP-CVF-2-2-s-focus.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	545.7 KB
ID:	1118706
                            It's a subjective decision, but it would be distracting enough to be a rejection for me.

                            Comment


                            • Understandable,

                              Would this crop work instead? Also not sure which registration to submit it as if I were since it's currently at a leasing company called MG Aviation (not in the database) as VP-CVF. It was originally LN-LNL for Norwegian prior to it's termination from service.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	VP-CVF-1.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	684.0 KB
ID:	1118888

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
                                Understandable,

                                Would this crop work instead? Also not sure which registration to submit it as if I were since it's currently at a leasing company called MG Aviation (not in the database) as VP-CVF. It was originally LN-LNL for Norwegian prior to it's termination from service.

                                Click image for larger version  Name:	VP-CVF-1.jpg Views:	0 Size:	684.0 KB ID:	1118888
                                The crop could work (better if the Norwegian mark is complete in my opinion), but it is soft and blurry, so wouldn´t be accepted. The registration must be VP-CVF and other Norwegian planes like VP-CVE (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10154748) are under Norwegian´s name in the database, so use it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X