Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kamryn - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Kamryn View Post

    Awesome, thanks. Same for this one if you don't mind me asking.
    For any images with visible faces, it will be at the screener's discretion as to whether those faces might be identifiable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kamryn
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    People don't seem to be identifiable, so shouldn't be an issue.
    Awesome, thanks. Same for this one if you don't mind me asking.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	99-4011-1-s-stabilize.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	594.6 KB
ID:	1148129

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
    Hello! It's been awhile since I've needed assistance but I'm curious whether or not this photo would be accepted due to the civilians in the background. I believe in the past I've gotten a photo rejected for this very reason but I don't remember what it would be under.
    People don't seem to be identifiable, so shouldn't be an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kamryn
    replied
    Hello! It's been awhile since I've needed assistance but I'm curious whether or not this photo would be accepted due to the civilians in the background. I believe in the past I've gotten a photo rejected for this very reason but I don't remember what it would be under.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	18-5342-1-s-stabilize.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	661.8 KB
ID:	1148124

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
    Would this be acceptable? Wondering if the jetbridge and crop would be an issue.
    Technically not an issue, but I'd crop it a bit tighter on the right without cutting the engine. Also somewhat dark.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kamryn
    replied
    Would this be acceptable? Wondering if the jetbridge and crop would be an issue.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A51C79E4-28E8-426F-AC51-A0EA6560.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	690.3 KB
ID:	1131572
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
    It's been a little while, I was wondering if the following photos could be accepted
    Unlikely.

    1-3 contrast
    4 soft
    5 contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Kamryn
    replied
    It's been a little while, I was wondering if the following photos could be accepted

    Click image for larger version

Name:	465DA76A-1BA0-454C-8409-1574A797.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	770.5 KB
ID:	1129429Click image for larger version

Name:	0EC076D5-467C-4A40-A8DF-4182AB47.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	755.8 KB
ID:	1129430Click image for larger version

Name:	10BC884C-B38C-4BB7-A086-203F8DA4.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	637.5 KB
ID:	1129431Click image for larger version

Name:	A993ED1E-F431-4426-9A6A-D607F427.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	720.8 KB
ID:	1129432Click image for larger version

Name:	75D876ED-A88D-4D69-A8D1-03EF7E0E.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	757.2 KB
ID:	1129433

    Leave a comment:


  • Kamryn
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Should be possible to avoid the backlighting later in the afternoon, especially in the summer.
    The aircraft is at a tilted angle facing the northeast so it's a bit of a tough aircraft to shoot, But it's been accepted multiple times as backlit so I believe it's fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
    Hello! I'm wondering if this would be alright,

    Couple things to note is that photos of this registration and airframe have been submitted backlit because the aircraft is now not possible to shoot backlit, I also shot it a little bit low in frame to capture the full image of the spacecraft in the background. Let me know if that's alright.
    Should be possible to avoid the backlighting later in the afternoon, especially in the summer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kamryn
    replied
    Hello! I'm wondering if this would be alright,

    Couple things to note is that photos of this registration and airframe have been submitted backlit because the aircraft is now not possible to shoot backlit, I also shot it a little bit low in frame to capture the full image of the spacecraft in the background. Let me know if that's alright. Thanks!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	B69FBFB5-7D9F-4328-B036-352E5366.jpg
Views:	72
Size:	659.0 KB
ID:	1127976

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
    Would these photos be acceptable?

    Click image for larger version Name:	N7YS-4-s-stabilize.jpg Views:	0 Size:	359.8 KB ID:	1125963
    Click image for larger version Name:	N52EX-s-focus.jpg Views:	0 Size:	668.6 KB ID:	1125964
    First one is too soft, second one too dark

    Leave a comment:


  • Kamryn
    replied
    Would these photos be acceptable?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	N7YS-4-s-stabilize.jpg Views:	0 Size:	359.8 KB ID:	1125963
    Click image for larger version  Name:	N52EX-s-focus.jpg Views:	0 Size:	668.6 KB ID:	1125964

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Kamryn View Post
    Good morning / evening, would these be alright? I'm also wondering if the lighting on the bottom (3rd) image is alright.
    Borderline dark/contrast/compression for all three.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kamryn
    replied
    Good morning / evening, would these be alright? I'm also wondering if the lighting on the bottom (3rd) image is alright.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	6242E863-5807-4189-800E-57FA7AF8.jpg Views:	0 Size:	232.1 KB ID:	1125618
    Click image for larger version  Name:	8C6E0C2E-FD3D-4FFA-8471-1B10EF89.jpg Views:	0 Size:	410.5 KB ID:	1125619
    Click image for larger version  Name:	N302NV-s-stabilize.jpg Views:	0 Size:	353.0 KB ID:	1125620

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X