Originally posted by dlowwa
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Photo Advice (Pre-screen)
Collapse
X
-
-
2. dirty, borderline contrast
3. ok for me
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Contrast is very washed out, due to the haze between you and the aircraft. It's possible adjusting the curves might lead to an acceptable result, but as it is now, it would certainly be a rejection.
In the meantime, do you think these 3 would be acceptable for upload? (I'm a bit concerned with the clouds)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by raceface29 View Post
When you say the contrast is poor, does that mean that there is not enough of it? Is it a matter of the greens of the trees need to be "greener" and the airplane itself needs to be "brighter" (more whites, blues)? Any suggestions on how to improve it enough so that it is worth uploading?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
1. contrast still quite poor
2. yes backlit. not worth spending any more time/effort on.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by raceface29 View Post
Do you think this shot is any better?
I know this next one (Alaska 737) is not a pre-screen, but wanted to get some thoughts. It got rejected for too much/too little contrast and for being backlit. The sun is shining from the nose-side of the plane so I didn't think it would be backlit, but I'm guessing that the shadow cast on the APU/tail area is what makes this a backlist candidate? Also, this shot has no post-processing except for sharpening/noise reduction. In your opinion, is there too much or too little contrast? Lastly, is it worth fixing or is the backlit rejection unfixable here?
2. yes backlit. not worth spending any more time/effort on.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
This version is slightly worse. It does seem atmospheric conditions are affecting the quality.
I know this next one (Alaska 737) is not a pre-screen, but wanted to get some thoughts. It got rejected for too much/too little contrast and for being backlit. The sun is shining from the nose-side of the plane so I didn't think it would be backlit, but I'm guessing that the shadow cast on the APU/tail area is what makes this a backlist candidate? Also, this shot has no post-processing except for sharpening/noise reduction. In your opinion, is there too much or too little contrast? Lastly, is it worth fixing or is the backlit rejection unfixable here?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by raceface29 View Post
For the B744 shot, do you think it's fixable with post-processing (like the latest attached)? Or is this pretty useless due to the haze in the sky?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
1. contrast
2. soft/blurry, contrast
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Nope, this one looks fine.
Can I get a pre-screen on the attached photo?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Can't see anything that seems like an obvious area of concern.
Yes, but those were in the ~1280pix resolution, yes?
The VS A35K shot is 1280pix and was approved v. the latest of the AA CRJ. Both should be at 1280pix. What do you think of the CRJ pic? Is it still looking compressed?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: