Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

llpilch - prescreening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    Hello!

    1 .Does the Cirrus N138MF have a chance? Too much crop, I think the quality is gone;
    2. The Phenon N129GD has a very different painting scheme as the other photo on DB, is it hot to update on FR24?
    3. The Hawker N305SH, this registration is for an helicopter, again, is it hot? If yes, will I have to comment on "hot photo" field or is it automatic when I change the aircraft type?
    4. The Global N137ZM, this strange angle is acceptable? And the left wing was obstructed, so I cut it off, is it ok?
    5. Will the A321 CC-BEC be similar with this if this one gets accepted: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9013718 ? Different angles, different backgrounds, but the same takeoff sequence.

    thanks!
    Im not screener but in my opinion..

    1) Too much crop
    2) Its hot, yes.
    3) Also hot. You have to comment on "hot photo" field
    4) For me the main problem is the quality. About the crop Im not sure at all, but for me it would be cut off.
    5) Same take off sequence, similar.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

      Im not screener but in my opinion..

      1) Too much crop
      2) Its hot, yes.
      3) Also hot. You have to comment on "hot photo" field
      4) For me the main problem is the quality. About the crop Im not sure at all, but for me it would be cut off.
      5) Same take off sequence, similar.
      Thanks!

      Does this picture have a chance? As it's very difficult to get a photo like this, can the screening be a little more flexible with the noise?
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by llpilch View Post
        Does this picture have a chance? As it's very difficult to get a photo like this, can the screening be a little more flexible with the noise?
        Noise doesn't look like much of an issue, though the softness/blurriness does.

        Comment


        • #19
          Hello!

          The photo of the 737 tails should be uploaded as ramp or as one of those airplanes (PR-SDQ maybe)? If ramp, should I select the "airport overview" category?

          The A320 will be similar with this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/7120214
          (it's the same airport)

          thanks!
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by llpilch View Post
            Hello!

            The photo of the 737 tails should be uploaded as ramp or as one of those airplanes (PR-SDQ maybe)? If ramp, should I select the "airport overview" category?
            Yes, Ramp, Airport Overview.

            Originally posted by llpilch View Post
            The A320 will be similar with this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/7120214
            (it's the same airport)
            Depends on the difference in time. If more than 5-6 years between them, shouldn't be similar.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

              Yes, Ramp, Airport Overview.



              Depends on the difference in time. If more than 5-6 years between them, shouldn't be similar.
              Thanks!

              Didn't know about the time, there is 10 years between the 2 photos, I like it, will upload then!

              Comment


              • #22
                Hello!

                I know that the PT-PTR photo is unlevel, but that obstruction of the landing gear is a problem? I saw photos accepted with this kind of obstruction, but I think that maybe this one is too much obstructed.

                And the other photo, is this crop ok, or it's better to cut off the PR-BLG tail?
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by llpilch View Post
                  Hello!

                  I know that the PT-PTR photo is unlevel, but that obstruction of the landing gear is a problem? I saw photos accepted with this kind of obstruction, but I think that maybe this one is too much obstructed.
                  A little too much obstruction yes, especially the nose wheel which is completely blocked.

                  Originally posted by llpilch View Post
                  And the other photo, is this crop ok, or it's better to cut off the PR-BLG tail?
                  Crop is ok for me.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    A little too much obstruction yes, especially the nose wheel which is completely blocked.



                    Crop is ok for me.
                    Thanks! I will not upload that photo

                    On the 737 photo, is that guy next to the engine a problem?

                    The KC390 was rejected by contrast, I asked here for an improved version and was not good enough, what about now?
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by llpilch View Post
                      On the 737 photo, is that guy next to the engine a problem?
                      Shouldn't be.

                      Originally posted by llpilch View Post
                      The KC390 was rejected by contrast, I asked here for an improved version and was not good enough, what about now?
                      Slightly worse than last posted one. The real issue is the overcast light, something editing can't do a whole lot to fix.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Hello! Wing views taken at final approach, when the airport isn't visible, but the city is, should be uploaded with location "in flight" or the name of the airport?

                        It's just a doubt about it:

                        "1.2.6 Uploading Wing Views


                        Photos taken airborne need the country and 'Inflight' as location, unless an airport is visible."


                        I always thougt that if it's possible to see the city of the airport would be possible to sent with the airport name, it would help to upload more wing views of the same flight without being similar
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by llpilch View Post
                          Hello! Wing views taken at final approach, when the airport isn't visible, but the city is, should be uploaded with location "in flight" or the name of the airport?
                          Inflight.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                            Inflight.
                            Thanks, and that picture from my previous post will be similar with this one?
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10184564

                            Same flight, but one at takeoff and the other landing

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by llpilch View Post

                              Thanks, and that picture from my previous post will be similar with this one?
                              https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10184564

                              Same flight, but one at takeoff and the other landing
                              Yes, similar.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X