Originally posted by llpilch
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
llpilch - prescreening request
Collapse
X
-
Hello!
I would like to know if the the attached photo of PS-BED will be considered similar to this one already accepted: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10356908
I know that night shots and day-time shots are not considered similar, but in this case, despite being uploaded under "night shot" category as requested by the site, the accepted photo was taken at sunset, maybe can be considered day yet, I don't know.
Also, will the PR-PTG photo be rejected by backlit?
Thanks!
Comment
-
Originally posted by llpilch View PostHello!
I would like to know if the the attached photo of PS-BED will be considered similar to this one already accepted: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10356908
Originally posted by llpilch View PostAlso, will the PR-PTG photo be rejected by backlit?
Comment
-
Hello!
Please, take a look on these 3 rejections:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
In one of them, the screener sent a comment: "very noisy sky"
I can't agree with this... "VERY noisy"? The images just have the normal amount of noise expected for a digital image! I do not agree it is enough to reject the photo, it is very weak.
Should I appeal?
Comment
-
Originally posted by llpilch View PostHello!
Please, take a look on these 3 rejections:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
In one of them, the screener sent a comment: "very noisy sky"
I can't agree with this... "VERY noisy"? The images just have the normal amount of noise expected for a digital image! I do not agree it is enough to reject the photo, it is very weak.
Should I appeal?
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Maybe not 'very' noisy, but it is noticeable (and the images were seen by two senior screeners) so you are unlikely to have the rejections overturned.
But the other 2 imagens has way less noise! 9699013 and 9699008 didn't needed to be rejected
Comment
-
Originally posted by llpilch View Post
Thanks Dana! Ok, I agree that the image 9699004 has a strange noise in the sky, I could have paid more attention when editing and before uploading. Still don't think it is a big deal, but ok, the noise is there, will not appeal.
But the other 2 imagens has way less noise! 9699013 and 9699008 didn't needed to be rejected
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by llpilch View PostHello, what about the 727 as night shot (taken before sunrise)?
The A330, will it be rejected by obstruction on the nose gear?
And the 737, can this framing be accepted? I choose to keep it in the bottom of the frame and not cut the A380
2. better if no obstruction, yes.
3. borderline. would be a subjective call.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
1. ..shadow is visible, are you sure that's before sunrise? Not night shot in any case.
2. better if no obstruction, yes.
3. borderline. would be a subjective call.
2. I'll try another, thanks!
Comment
-
-
Hi!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Please, I would like a feedback about this rejection. I myself have some tail shots like this accepted, I have some engine close up shots accepted, it's common to see photos with parts cut off here, not cut off parts with no reason, like said on the guidelines, but photos that are clearly intended to do only a close-up of some part, maybe to show some detail or give more enphasis to an especific part like the tail or the fuselage, or maybe to do a different photo.
I like a lot pictures with close on the tail and the wingtip. Being honest, this plane was obstructed and was impossible to do a photo of the entire airframe ( https://www.draeronaves.com.br/img/f...1_P1310333.jpg ), but still being an "ok" photo with some details that are not so visible in normal shots, the frame looks cool with almost no empty spaces.
Comment
-
Originally posted by llpilch View PostHi!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Please, I would like a feedback about this rejection. I myself have some tail shots like this accepted, I have some engine close up shots accepted, it's common to see photos with parts cut off here, not cut off parts with no reason, like said on the guidelines, but photos that are clearly intended to do only a close-up of some part, maybe to show some detail or give more enphasis to an especific part like the tail or the fuselage, or maybe to do a different photo.
I like a lot pictures with close on the tail and the wingtip. Being honest, this plane was obstructed and was impossible to do a photo of the entire airframe ( https://www.draeronaves.com.br/img/f...1_P1310333.jpg ), but still being an "ok" photo with some details that are not so visible in normal shots, the frame looks cool with almost no empty spaces.
Comment
Comment