Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

llpilch - prescreening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • llpilch
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

    Im not screener but in my opinion..

    1) Too much crop
    2) Its hot, yes.
    3) Also hot. You have to comment on "hot photo" field
    4) For me the main problem is the quality. About the crop Im not sure at all, but for me it would be cut off.
    5) Same take off sequence, similar.
    Thanks!

    Does this picture have a chance? As it's very difficult to get a photo like this, can the screening be a little more flexible with the noise?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    Hello!

    1 .Does the Cirrus N138MF have a chance? Too much crop, I think the quality is gone;
    2. The Phenon N129GD has a very different painting scheme as the other photo on DB, is it hot to update on FR24?
    3. The Hawker N305SH, this registration is for an helicopter, again, is it hot? If yes, will I have to comment on "hot photo" field or is it automatic when I change the aircraft type?
    4. The Global N137ZM, this strange angle is acceptable? And the left wing was obstructed, so I cut it off, is it ok?
    5. Will the A321 CC-BEC be similar with this if this one gets accepted: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9013718 ? Different angles, different backgrounds, but the same takeoff sequence.

    thanks!
    Im not screener but in my opinion..

    1) Too much crop
    2) Its hot, yes.
    3) Also hot. You have to comment on "hot photo" field
    4) For me the main problem is the quality. About the crop Im not sure at all, but for me it would be cut off.
    5) Same take off sequence, similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    replied
    Hello!

    1 .Does the Cirrus N138MF have a chance? Too much crop, I think the quality is gone;
    2. The Phenon N129GD has a very different painting scheme as the other photo on DB, is it hot to update on FR24?
    3. The Hawker N305SH, this registration is for an helicopter, again, is it hot? If yes, will I have to comment on "hot photo" field or is it automatic when I change the aircraft type?
    4. The Global N137ZM, this strange angle is acceptable? And the left wing was obstructed, so I cut it off, is it ok?
    5. Will the A321 CC-BEC be similar with this if this one gets accepted: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9013718 ? Different angles, different backgrounds, but the same takeoff sequence.

    thanks!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    What about this one, as "ramp"? Had to use very high ISO setting as the 767 was taxiing (the reason why it is blurry). But i like the picture because for this little airport it is a rare event, those cargos are common, every week, but the 3 together is very rare!
    You could try, I think motive is ok for a ramp shot, though not sure the quality is there.

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    replied
    What about this one, as "ramp"? Had to use very high ISO setting as the 767 was taxiing (the reason why it is blurry). But i like the picture because for this little airport it is a rare event, those cargos are common, every week, but the 3 together is very rare!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    dlowwa thanks for all your attention here!

    What do you think about the 5 below? All of them has something bothering me, don't think they have a chance, but asking is free
    1. soft, compression
    2. soft
    3. borderline soft (tail)
    4. ok for me
    5. soft, overexposed, contrast, color (purple fringing)

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    replied
    dlowwa thanks for all your attention here!

    What do you think about the 5 below? All of them has something bothering me, don't think they have a chance, but asking is free
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    Hi!
    I read in the upload guidelines that vehicles license plates should be blurred (otherwise, "motive" rejection), but in this picture there is a woman too. Is it a problem?
    If no, this picture works better as an airport overview than spotting location, right? The spotting point itself isn't so evident. But the vehicle and the women on the street shows that it is a public street to spotting, so, I don't know!

    help!
    Blurring car plates is allowed, but blurring faces is not and would result in a rejection for manipulation. In this particular image, I don't think the vehicle/person adds anything. Spotting Location/Airport Overview could both apply.

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    replied
    Hi!
    I read in the upload guidelines that vehicles license plates should be blurred (otherwise, "motive" rejection), but in this picture there is a woman too. Is it a problem?
    If no, this picture works better as an airport overview than spotting location, right? The spotting point itself isn't so evident. But the vehicle and the women on the street shows that it is a public street to spotting, so, I don't know!

    help!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    Does the Lufthansa 777 have any chance?
    No.

    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    The KC-390 was rejected by contrast, is it ok now?
    Slightly better, but still borderline.

    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    What about the E195-E2?
    Backlit/contrast.

    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    And the MD11?
    Would be rejected for contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    replied
    Hi!

    Does the Lufthansa 777 have any chance? Was dark yet, less than an hour after the sunrise and very cloudy, terrible conditions

    The KC-390 was rejected by contrast, is it ok now?

    What about the E195-E2?

    And the MD11? (as you can see, cloudy days are very common here )
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Hello,

    Please read here when you get the chance, especially #2:

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    replied
    Hello guys!

    Well, I know you prefer to ask here before uploading the photos, but this is about a doubt in categories, which I can fix.
    Recently I got an accepted photo and the screener gently sent a comment saying that he added "night shot" for me. Man, thanks a lot! Would be so frustrating to lose a queue slot with more than 14k photos on queue!

    So I read the upload guidelines to see what I was missing about this category and I believe the answer to my question is "yes", but I just want to confirm, specially the 4th and 5th photos:

    Does "night shot" apply for all the pictures below?
    1- https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8949404
    2- https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8933118
    3- https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8931402
    4- https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8939618
    5- https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8949405

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by llpilch View Post
    ok, thank you! I'll upload just one exposure. Is it better as "airport overview" or "ramp"?
    Ramp, though we usually have long-exposure departures/arrivals under Runway.

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    replied
    ok, thank you! I'll upload just one exposure. Is it better as "airport overview" or "ramp"?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X