Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Invalid hot/ Postprocessing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Invalid hot/ Postprocessing advice

    Helo!
    I would like to know why this photo is considered hot because in my view it is neither the first record nor there is a change in the painting, some friends tried to go up as hot before they had their photos rejected. (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10129501)
    If you can review and explain the reason why the photo was accepted, thank you!
    Rejected: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9073080

  • #2
    Originally posted by PapaEchoDelta View Post
    Helo!
    I would like to know why this photo is considered hot because in my view it is neither the first record nor there is a change in the painting, some friends tried to go up as hot before they had their photos rejected. (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10129501)
    If you can review and explain the reason why the photo was accepted, thank you!
    Rejected: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9073080
    It seems that it was accepted by mistake. This happens sometimes, screeners are human.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

      It seems that it was accepted by mistake. This happens sometimes, screeners are human.
      Don’t think it was a mistake. The Brazil flag was painted

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by NYspotter View Post

        Don’t think it was a mistake. The Brazil flag was painted
        the flag was also present on the pic rejected by "Invalid Hot".
        My pictures: https://www.jetphotos.com/photographer/46959

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Leo 747 View Post

          the flag was also present on the pic rejected by "Invalid Hot".
          As for me I do not think it was a case regarding the 48-hour rule. It was only a new painting job not a special scheme so only the first pic was counted

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by NYspotter View Post

            Don’t think it was a mistake. The Brazil flag was painted
            I totally agree. Whoever made the post must be "bothered" and as he has nothing to do instead of congratulating, he creates undesirable posts.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Radioactivity View Post

              I totally agree. Whoever made the post must be "bothered" and as he has nothing to do instead of congratulating, he creates undesirable posts.
              You probably misunderstood the situation. Let me create a timeline for you:

              April 12th: plane operated from GRU, already sporting the Brazilian flag near the cockpit. Spotters had their pics rejected due to "Invalid Hot"

              April 14th: plane was in Porto Alegre. A friend of mine uploaded his pic as a Hot, and was rejected due to "Invalid Hot" aswell.

              April 15th: plane goes to GIG, and the Hot pic was accepted in database.

              As Dana said, the acceptance of the GIG picture was a screener mistake.
              My pictures: https://www.jetphotos.com/photographer/46959

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Radioactivity View Post

                I totally agree. Whoever made the post must be "bothered" and as he has nothing to do instead of congratulating, he creates undesirable posts.
                Leo said everything above, he is right.

                Everybody can express their thoughs when felling something unfair happened, specially doing it respectfully as PapaEchoDelta did.

                Comment

                Working...
                X