Invalid hot/ Postprocessing advice

[llpilch]

I totally agree. Whoever made the post must be "bothered" and as he has nothing to do instead of congratulating, he creates undesirable posts.

Leo said everything above, he is right.

Everybody can express their thoughs when felling something unfair happened, specially doing it respectfully as PapaEchoDelta did.

[Leo 747]

I totally agree. Whoever made the post must be "bothered" and as he has nothing to do instead of congratulating, he creates undesirable posts.

You probably misunderstood the situation. Let me create a timeline for you:

April 12th: plane operated from GRU, already sporting the Brazilian flag near the cockpit. Spotters had their pics rejected due to "Invalid Hot"

April 14th: plane was in Porto Alegre. A friend of mine uploaded his pic as a Hot, and was rejected due to "Invalid Hot" aswell.

April 15th: plane goes to GIG, and the Hot pic was accepted in database.

As Dana said, the acceptance of the GIG picture was a screener mistake.

[Radioactivity]

Don’t think it was a mistake. The Brazil flag was painted

I totally agree. Whoever made the post must be "bothered" and as he has nothing to do instead of congratulating, he creates undesirable posts.

[NYspotter]

the flag was also present on the pic rejected by "Invalid Hot".

As for me I do not think it was a case regarding the 48-hour rule. It was only a new painting job not a special scheme so only the first pic was counted

[Leo 747]

Don’t think it was a mistake. The Brazil flag was painted

the flag was also present on the pic rejected by "Invalid Hot".

[NYspotter]

It seems that it was accepted by mistake. This happens sometimes, screeners are human.

Don’t think it was a mistake. The Brazil flag was painted

[dlowwa]

Helo!
I would like to know why this photo is considered hot because in my view it is neither the first record nor there is a change in the painting, some friends tried to go up as hot before they had their photos rejected. (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10129501)
If you can review and explain the reason why the photo was accepted, thank you!
Rejected: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9073080

It seems that it was accepted by mistake. This happens sometimes, screeners are human.

[PapaEchoDelta]

Helo!
I would like to know why this photo is considered hot because in my view it is neither the first record nor there is a change in the painting, some friends tried to go up as hot before they had their photos rejected. (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10129501)
If you can review and explain the reason why the photo was accepted, thank you!
Rejected: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9073080