Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
KampfHase - Rejection/Screening advice
Collapse
X
-
Would this picture be considered cut-off? Unfortunately some aircraft used the rear part of the runway which is partly cut off.
-
Originally posted by KampfHase View PostCan you please accept these two rejects. Both have been rejected for wrong airline private, both are owned by fake letterbox airlines. I recently tried to add such airlines and got angry replies not to do this.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Additionaly, these two have also been rejected for wrong aircraft type, while both are 100% correct.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
As we can only appeal once every 24 hours, please do it this way. Thank you very much.
Leave a comment:
-
Can you please accept these two rejects. Both have been rejected for wrong airline private, both are owned by fake letterbox airlines. I recently tried to add such airlines and got angry replies not to do this.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Additionaly, these two have also been rejected for wrong aircraft type, while both are 100% correct.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
As we can only appeal once every 24 hours, please do it this way. Thank you very much.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KampfHase View PostCan please someone take a look at this reject:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I suppose you mean the "halo" around the cockpit. It is all natural. Here is a unedited version of that picture. You can see that the clouds are not lightened by any editing.
If this would have been caused by editing you would also see this at the spinner or the tail.
Leave a comment:
-
Can please someone take a look at this reject:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I suppose you mean the "halo" around the cockpit. It is all natural. Here is a unedited version of that picture. You can see that the clouds are not lightened by any editing.
If this would have been caused by editing you would also see this at the spinner or the tail.
Leave a comment:
-
Some admin renamed my thread here „rejection advice“.
I do not want to open a new thread for each advice I need.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KampfHase View PostCan please someone explain me what is wrong with the data of this picture:
aircraft is owned by the EAA, according to their museum website and the FAA, and it’s on display in their museum at KOSH airport.
also this one please:
It is also owned by the EAA, and is on display in their hangar at the Pioneer airport, not museum. It also is taken with a wide angle lens, so the edges are leaning, but the center of the picture should be upright.
Leave a comment:
-
Can please someone explain me what is wrong with the data of this picture:
aircraft is owned by the EAA, according to their museum website and the FAA, and it’s on display in their museum at KOSH airport.
also this one please:
It is also owned by the EAA, and is on display in their hangar at the Pioneer airport, not museum. It also is taken with a wide angle lens, so the edges are leaning, but the center of the picture should be upright.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostI've combined all of your previous threads, but in the future please post all queries in the same thread.
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostFirst image has a strong magenta cast
Originally posted by dlowwa View Postbut the second would have been ok for me
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KampfHase View PostCan please someone help me with these 2 rejects:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Both of them have been taking while the sky was on fire on sunset. You can even see the sky in the cockpit windows of the first one. This is how it looked with the naked eye, you know it is also changing in minutes. The second picture has been taken only 2 minutes after the other one, and the sunset was gone. I don't know why this has also been rejected. It is still a little bit pink due to the sunset, but also illuminated by the hangar lights off the frame on the right. The saturation slider for both pics in Lightroom are at +-0, everything else would look unreal.
I have also taken two mobile shots a few minutes later because the sky really was spectacular:
Could you please reconsider them, that's really how it looked like on that evening. It was the only sun we saw the whole day
Have a question about Photo Editing software (Photoshop, Paint Shop Pro, etc.), improving your photos, etc.? Our crew of Photo Screeners is here to help you out!
I've combined all of your previous threads, but in the future please post all queries in the same thread.
First image has a strong magenta cast, but the second would have been ok for me, so I can't offer much advice on that one.
Leave a comment:
-
Can please someone help me with these 2 rejects:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Both of them have been taking while the sky was on fire on sunset. You can even see the sky in the cockpit windows of the first one. This is how it looked with the naked eye, you know it is also changing in minutes. The second picture has been taken only 2 minutes after the other one, and the sunset was gone. I don't know why this has also been rejected. It is still a little bit pink due to the sunset, but also illuminated by the hangar lights off the frame on the right. The saturation slider for both pics in Lightroom are at +-0, everything else would look unreal.
I have also taken two mobile shots a few minutes later because the sky really was spectacular:
Could you please reconsider them, that's really how it looked like on that evening. It was the only sun we saw the whole day
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KampfHase View PostHi guys,
sorry to open a new topic here but I am slowly despairing here with rejections due to horizon unlevel. I already explained everything in both an appeal and in a reupload under comment to screeners, both unheard.
I took pictures inside the "Aeroseum" - an aviation museum inside a former World War bunker at Gothenburg Säve airport in Sweden. When entering the bunker, the first section of the museum is going downwards. The floor is constantly sloping downwards until you reach the first door. Better seen on a map like this --> click.
Aircraft are already parked there, on the sloping floor. The only vertical references you can find there are vertical pipes on the wall for the sprinkler system.
I now used these pipes as reference when leveling my photos. All of them were rejected despite the comment I made explaining the situation.
Two of these pictures are linked here. Both are new aircraft for the db and 100% leveled to the left pipe visible in the picture.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Can please some admin reconsider these pics given the circumstances I explained here? I assume there will be no chance to get pictures of these aircraft outside the bunker.
Thank you very much!
-Oli
Leave a comment:
-
Hi guys,
sorry to open a new topic here but I am slowly despairing here with rejections due to horizon unlevel. I already explained everything in both an appeal and in a reupload under comment to screeners, both unheard.
I took pictures inside the "Aeroseum" - an aviation museum inside a former World War bunker at Gothenburg Säve airport in Sweden. When entering the bunker, the first section of the museum is going downwards. The floor is constantly sloping downwards until you reach the first door. Better seen on a map like this --> click.
Aircraft are already parked there, on the sloping floor. The only vertical references you can find there are vertical pipes on the wall for the sprinkler system.
I now used these pipes as reference when leveling my photos. All of them were rejected despite the comment I made explaining the situation.
Two of these pictures are linked here. Both are new aircraft for the db and 100% leveled to the left pipe visible in the picture.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Can please some admin reconsider these pics given the circumstances I explained here? I assume there will be no chance to get pictures of these aircraft outside the bunker.
Thank you very much!
-Oli
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: