Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

KampfHase - Rejection/Screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KampfHase View Post
    Can please someone answer me. 67-21434 or N4070Q for the Cessna linked above?
    This is the editing forum, not data/info. Editors have final say for such decisions, but usually original reg. if known is preferred.

    Leave a comment:


  • KampfHase
    replied
    Can please someone answer me. 67-21434 or N4070Q for the Cessna linked above?

    Leave a comment:


  • KampfHase
    replied
    Please tell me which registration I need to use for this aircraft.



    It is freshly painted in the livery of "67-21434" in which it operated from 1967 to 1994. Its latest civil reg is "N4070Q" which it used from 1994 to 2018. Either reg is new for the database.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KampfHase View Post
    Would this picture be acceptable with the extended background to show more of the nice mountains? Or is it "subject to far"?
    Would be a centering rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • TRTPUwU
    replied
    Originally posted by KampfHase View Post
    Would this picture be acceptable with the extended background to show more of the nice mountains? Or is it "subject to far"?
    It needs a tighter crop to the right, you can leave the chopper a bit low/centered to show the mountains though
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • neto.911
    replied
    Originally posted by KampfHase View Post
    Would this picture be acceptable with the extended background to show more of the nice mountains? Or is it "subject to far"?
    for sure needs a tighter crop to be acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • KampfHase
    replied
    Would this picture be acceptable with the extended background to show more of the nice mountains? Or is it "subject to far"?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KampfHase View Post

    So not the whole aircraft counts, only the fuselage?
    Usually, yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • KampfHase
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Too low in the frame.
    So not the whole aircraft counts, only the fuselage?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KampfHase View Post
    Can please someone judge this picture if it is correctly centered. It's a difficult angle. If you only look at the fuselage separately it looks too low, but regarding the dead space it has more on the bottom so it should be lower.

    I have some of the same angle taken at MDW so I want to be sure I crop them correctly.
    Too low in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • KampfHase
    replied
    Can please someone judge this picture if it is correctly centered. It's a difficult angle. If you only look at the fuselage separately it looks too low, but regarding the dead space it has more on the bottom so it should be lower.

    I have some of the same angle taken at MDW so I want to be sure I crop them correctly.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KampfHase View Post
    Would this picture be considered cut-off? Unfortunately some aircraft used the rear part of the runway which is partly cut off.
    Cut off, no. Obstructed, yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • KampfHase
    replied
    Would this picture be considered cut-off? Unfortunately some aircraft used the rear part of the runway which is partly cut off.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KampfHase View Post
    Can you please accept these two rejects. Both have been rejected for wrong airline private, both are owned by fake letterbox airlines. I recently tried to add such airlines and got angry replies not to do this.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Additionaly, these two have also been rejected for wrong aircraft type, while both are 100% correct.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    As we can only appeal once every 24 hours, please do it this way. Thank you very much.
    This is the digital photo processing forum. Perhaps you should post the data/info forum where the editors would be better able to answer your questions.

    Leave a comment:


  • KampfHase
    replied
    Can you please accept these two rejects. Both have been rejected for wrong airline private, both are owned by fake letterbox airlines. I recently tried to add such airlines and got angry replies not to do this.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Additionaly, these two have also been rejected for wrong aircraft type, while both are 100% correct.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    As we can only appeal once every 24 hours, please do it this way. Thank you very much.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X