Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing advice/pre

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Hello, are these images acceptable? My main concern is with the contrast as it was quite cloudy as well as with the dust spot removal. Click image for larger version

Name:	10-07-2021_JZR_A320_9K-CAP.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	455.3 KB
ID:	1119097Click image for larger version  Name:	10-07-2021_FDX_MD11_N602FE.jpg Views:	0 Size:	391.9 KB ID:	1119093Click image for larger version  Name:	10-07-2021_PAL_A333_RP-C8771.jpg Views:	0 Size:	397.2 KB ID:	1119094Click image for larger version  Name:	10-07-2021_MSR_789_SU-GEU.jpg Views:	0 Size:	416.5 KB ID:	1119095

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
      Hello, are these images acceptable? My main concern is with the contrast as it was quite cloudy as well as with the dust spot removal.
      All borderline for soft/close crop/soft/contrast/color.

      Comment


      • #93
        Finished re-editing the FDX, MSR, and PAL. Are they better now? Click image for larger version

Name:	10-07-2021_PAL_A333_RP-C8771.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	356.0 KB
ID:	1119189Click image for larger version

Name:	10-07-2021_MSR_789_SU-GEU.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	426.2 KB
ID:	1119190Click image for larger version

Name:	10-07-2021_FDX_MD11_N602FE.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	409.0 KB
ID:	1119188

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
          Finished re-editing the FDX, MSR, and PAL. Are they better now? Click image for larger version

Name:	10-07-2021_PAL_A333_RP-C8771.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	356.0 KB
ID:	1119189Click image for larger version

Name:	10-07-2021_MSR_789_SU-GEU.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	426.2 KB
ID:	1119190Click image for larger version

Name:	10-07-2021_FDX_MD11_N602FE.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	409.0 KB
ID:	1119188
          All issues remain/are the same, except you can replace 'soft' with 'oversharpened'.

          Comment


          • #95
            Hello, I recently got a pic of this PAL A330 rejected for being dark/under-exposed so I've re-edited it and would like to know if it would be acceptable now. Click image for larger version

Name:	09-10-2021_PAL_A333_RP-C8782.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	428.9 KB
ID:	1126193 Thanks

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
              Hello, I recently got a pic of this PAL A330 rejected for being dark/under-exposed so I've re-edited it and would like to know if it would be acceptable now.
              A bit dark, but exposure would be acceptable for me.

              Comment


              • #97
                Hello, sorry if this is a silly/obvious question. I have this image of N572UP and I was wondering if it would be rejected for being similar to another picture of mine of the same aircraft ( https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10159125 ). They were taken almost 2 months apart (April 23 vs June 11) Click image for larger version  Name:	11-06-2021_UPS_744F_N572UP.jpg Views:	0 Size:	404.5 KB ID:	1126333 Thanks

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
                  Hello, sorry if this is a silly/obvious question. I have this image of N572UP and I was wondering if it would be rejected for being similar to another picture of mine of the same aircraft ( https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10159125 ). They were taken almost 2 months apart (April 23 vs June 11)
                  Yes similar.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Hello, can I get advice for these please? My main concern is sharpness on the MC-21, centering/composition for the Su-30s, A359, and 779, and compression for the Su-30s and 779. Click image for larger version

Name:	14-11-2021_RUSAF_Su-30_FRMTN.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	610.3 KB
ID:	1127362Click image for larger version  Name:	14-11-2021_IRK_MC23_73055.jpg Views:	0 Size:	405.8 KB ID:	1127355Click image for larger version  Name:	14-11-2021_AIB_A359_F-WWCF.jpg Views:	0 Size:	515.2 KB ID:	1127351Click image for larger version  Name:	14-11-2021_BOE_779_N779XW.jpg Views:	0 Size:	483.0 KB ID:	1127350

                    I also have this image of the 779 from a different angle. Can I post both 779 pics or just one of them? Click image for larger version  Name:	14-11-2021_BOE_779_N779XW.jpg Views:	0 Size:	349.0 KB ID:	1127358
                    Thanks

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
                      Hello, can I get advice for these please?
                      1. borderline dark
                      2-3. ok for me
                      4-5. not similar

                      Comment


                      • Hello, can I get advice for this one please? Click image for larger version

Name:	14-11-2021_ETD_78X_A6-BMH.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	380.9 KB
ID:	1127685Thanks

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
                          Hello, can I get advice for this one please? Click image for larger version

Name:	14-11-2021_ETD_78X_A6-BMH.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	380.9 KB
ID:	1127685Thanks
                          Borderline for the empty space in between, but the quality looks ok to me.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X