Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening help (nsxr_)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pre-screening help (nsxr_)

    Hello, would this image be considered heat hazed?Click image for larger version  Name:	OMDB_10-04-2022_BLA_B38M_YR-MXB.jpg Views:	0 Size:	609.3 KB ID:	1134810 Thanks

    Also, I'm using my main account now so if it would be possible to merge my previous thread I made with my other account (nsxr__) that would be appreciated (https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...e9#post1134774)

  • #2
    Hey guys,

    Are these pictures ok? Anything I can do to improve them? Click image for larger version

Name:	FDX77F.jpg
Views:	731
Size:	528.9 KB
ID:	1114846Click image for larger version

Name:	SVA789.jpg
Views:	765
Size:	513.0 KB
ID:	1114847Click image for larger version

Name:	DAO734.jpg
Views:	717
Size:	582.9 KB
ID:	1114848Click image for larger version

Name:	UAE77W.jpg
Views:	706
Size:	514.9 KB
ID:	1114849

    Click image for larger version

Name:	UPS748.jpg
Views:	828
Size:	497.1 KB
ID:	1114845

    Comment


    • #3
      Hello,

      Please read here when you get the chance, especially #6:



      Prescreening advice will not be given to images that cannot be uploaded. You will need to post images that are properly sized, but already issues with color, centering, and overexposure are visible, so simply re-sizing is unlikely to make them acceptable.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hello, I'd like some advice on these please. Thanks.
        Click image for larger version

Name:	ups748.jpg
Views:	553
Size:	118.5 KB
ID:	1114928Click image for larger version

Name:	sva789.jpg
Views:	556
Size:	111.1 KB
ID:	1114927Click image for larger version

Name:	dao734.jpg
Views:	554
Size:	110.4 KB
ID:	1114925Click image for larger version

Name:	fdxmd11.jpg
Views:	556
Size:	133.0 KB
ID:	1114926 Also, apologies for my incompetence previously. It will not happen again.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
          Hello, I'd like some advice on these please. Thanks.
          These images would be rejected for soft, dark, contrast, and compression. #3 is also poorly centered.

          Comment


          • #6
            I've tweaked the 734 pic. Is this better? Click image for larger version

Name:	DAO_734.jpg
Views:	569
Size:	354.8 KB
ID:	1114932

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
              I've tweaked the 734 pic. Is this better?
              Exposure is slightly better. All other issues (centering, contrast, compression, softness) remain, and light editing halos are now visible.

              Comment


              • #8
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DAO_734.jpg
Views:	559
Size:	388.0 KB
ID:	1114937 Made some more edits. This any better?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DAO_734.jpg
Views:	559
Size:	388.0 KB
ID:	1114937 Made some more edits. This any better?
                  Yes, slowly getting better

                  A bit low in the frame, and slightly dark, but almost acceptable now.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    Yes, slowly getting better

                    A bit low in the frame, and slightly dark, but almost acceptable now.
                    Awesome, thanks! I'll edit some more tomorrow and upload the final (hopefully) version then

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Click image for larger version  Name:	DAO_734_5Y-FQB_2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	386.4 KB ID:	1114957 Here is the final (hopefully) version. Better?

                      Also edited the UPS 748. If I could receive some advice on it, that'd be awesome. Click image for larger version

Name:	UPS_748_N625UP.jpg
Views:	523
Size:	368.8 KB
ID:	1114962

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
                        Click image for larger version Name:	DAO_734_5Y-FQB_2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	386.4 KB ID:	1114957 Here is the final (hopefully) version. Better?

                        Also edited the UPS 748. If I could receive some advice on it, that'd be awesome. Click image for larger version

Name:	UPS_748_N625UP.jpg
Views:	523
Size:	368.8 KB
ID:	1114962
                        1. still a bit soft in spots and slight editing halos visible.
                        2. ok for me.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I'd like some editing advice on this one please. Thanks. Click image for larger version

Name:	FDX_MD11_N589FE.jpg
Views:	504
Size:	400.8 KB
ID:	1115004

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by nsxr__ View Post
                            I'd like some editing advice on this one please. Thanks. Click image for larger version

Name:	FDX_MD11_N589FE.jpg
Views:	504
Size:	400.8 KB
ID:	1115004
                            A bit soft/blurry in spots, and also slightly high in the frame.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Some advice for this too please. Click image for larger version  Name:	UPS_744_N572UP.jpg Views:	0 Size:	404.2 KB ID:	1115015 I edited the FDX too, if you could check that out as well. Thanks for all the help! Click image for larger version

Name:	2.jpg
Views:	508
Size:	446.4 KB
ID:	1115016

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X