Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New member - pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Next few pictures to asses:
    1) Is the contrast acceptable now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-AWHR_QFO_(P1120652)-v2.jpg
Views:	111
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1136039
    2)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-VQQ_WAW_(IMG_2764).jpg
Views:	107
Size:	630.1 KB
ID:	1136040
    3)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-LSF_WAW_(IMG_3974)-denoised.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	810.7 KB
ID:	1136041
    4)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	HA-LXY_CFU_(IMG_8177).jpg
Views:	106
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1136042
    5)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	F-GKXR_CFU_(IMG_9091).jpg
Views:	118
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1136043

    Comment


    • #17
      1 is a tad dark and has contrast issues due to the overcast sky
      2 is a tad soft, otherwise okay
      3 should be acceptable
      4 and 5 are okay
      Best Regards from Germany,
      Julian S.​

      Comment


      • #18
        I have a few "hot" photos of new registration and I would like to ask kindly to asses them if they have chance to be accepted:
        1)
        Click image for larger version

Name:	OK-LML_LZPP_(B7A4401).jpg
Views:	97
Size:	1,019.3 KB
ID:	1136811
        2)
        Click image for larger version

Name:	OM-2711_LZPP_(IMG_6236)-denoised.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	888.6 KB
ID:	1136812
        3)
        Click image for larger version

Name:	OM-M626_LZPP_(IMG_4905).jpg
Views:	95
Size:	1.26 MB
ID:	1136813
        4)
        Click image for larger version

Name:	OK-ZLM_LZPP_(B7A4400).jpg
Views:	90
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1136814

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by WalAndPl View Post
          I have a few "hot" photos of new registration and I would like to ask kindly to asses them if they have chance to be accepted:
          First one is soft, others perhaps as well, but would be ok for me.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            First one is soft, others perhaps as well, but would be ok for me.
            I successfully uploaded last three and and gave up the first. Thank you very much for your support!

            Comment


            • #21
              Please asses a few photos of business jets/small aircrafts to upload:
              1)
              Click image for larger version

Name:	I-MDEA_WAW_IMG_0082-d1.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	343.5 KB
ID:	1149350
              2)
              Click image for larger version

Name:	OK-SLX_WAW_IMG_0066-d1.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	388.2 KB
ID:	1149351
              3)
              Click image for larger version

Name:	T7-CLA_WAW_IMG_0893-d1_v2.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	377.5 KB
ID:	1149352
              4)
              Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-FRS_WAW_IMG_8024-d1.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	917.1 KB
ID:	1149353
              5)
              Click image for larger version

Name:	SE-MOF_WAW_IMG_0279-d1.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	581.9 KB
ID:	1149354

              Thank you in advance!

              Andrzej

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by WalAndPl View Post
                Please asses a few photos of business jets/small aircrafts to upload:
                All ok for me except #4, which is soft (probably heat hazed).

                Comment


                • #23
                  May I ask for assessment of a few next pictures?
                  1)
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FAWZ_EPWA_IMG_2708-d2.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	766.4 KB
ID:	1149865
                  2)
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	HZ-ARG_EHAM_B7A8282-d1_1600.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	504.3 KB
ID:	1149866
                  3)
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	LX-N90450_BER_(IMG_9580)-d2.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	637.1 KB
ID:	1149867
                  4)
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-PSL_EPWA_IMG_5255-d1.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	986.9 KB
ID:	1149868
                  5)
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	YU-YAB_LOXZ_B7A1111.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1149869

                  Kind regards,

                  Andrzej

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by WalAndPl View Post
                    May I ask for assessment of a few next pictures?
                    1. dirty, borderline cut off
                    2-3. ok for me
                    4-5. borderline soft

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I have a couple of pictures to assess before uploading:
                      1)
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	139_EPOK_IMG_2269-d1.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1150047
                      2)
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-FDN_EPOK_IMG_4280-d1.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	1.34 MB
ID:	1150048
                      3)
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-AIR_EPOK_IMG_2110-d1.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1150049
                      4)
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-ANI_EPOK_IMG_2132-d1.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1150050
                      5)
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-AUP_EPOK_IMG_0069-d1.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	1.29 MB
ID:	1150051

                      Thank you very much for opinion!

                      Andrzej

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by WalAndPl View Post
                        I have a couple of pictures to assess before uploading:
                        1. obstruction
                        2. borderline soft/heat hazed
                        3-5. ok for me

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I have a few more photos to review, first one with additional questions:
                          1) The operator of this airplane in Jetphotos is "Belgium - Air Force (Luxaviation)". In addition to the quality of the photo, what should be the correct category of this aircraft - civilian or military, and if military, should it be additionally marked as "bussiness jet"?
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	OO-LUM_BER_(IMG_8479)-d1.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	688.7 KB
ID:	1150114
                          2)
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	A65-69_GWW_IMG_1848-d1.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	1.25 MB
ID:	1150115
                          3)
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	OM-AVR_LZPP_0B7A4404-d1.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	1.31 MB
ID:	1150116
                          4)
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-LFH_EPOK_IMG_9989-d1.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	1.31 MB
ID:	1150117
                          5)
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-MKD_EPOK_IMG_0080-d1.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	1.46 MB
ID:	1150118

                          Thank you in advance,

                          Andrzej

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by WalAndPl View Post
                            I have a few more photos to review, first one with additional questions:
                            1) The operator of this airplane in Jetphotos is "Belgium - Air Force (Luxaviation)". In addition to the quality of the photo, what should be the correct category of this aircraft - civilian or military, and if military, should it be additionally marked as "bussiness jet"?
                            Hello, please read here when you get the chance, especially #3:

                            https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

                            I am already considering reducing the number of requests allowed per day to three so that I don't get overwhelmed.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Thank you for remainding the rules - I mixed calendar days with 24-hours periods Moreover, as I don't want to make you overwhelmed, I voluntarily promise not to ask for assesment of more than three photos in a 24-hour period (it will be more than enough taking into considertion throughput of screening queue). So, may I ask kindly to ask for reviewing last 5-pictures set of pictures which I already sent ? Thank you in advance, Andrzej

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by WalAndPl View Post
                                I have a few more photos to review, first one with additional questions:
                                1. soft, overprocessed, compression, business jet, military
                                2. borderline horizon (CCW)
                                3. borderline soft/contrast/color
                                4. ok for me
                                5. borderline dark

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X