Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stefano Cassia - Pre-Screening/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hello, can I have an opinion of these photos? Tanks very much!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	17bis.JPG
Views:	78
Size:	780.6 KB
ID:	1128155

    Click image for larger version

Name:	19bis.JPG
Views:	67
Size:	389.1 KB
ID:	1128156

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Stefano Cassia View Post
      Hello, can I have an opinion of these photos? Tanks very much!
      1. soft
      2. dark/contrast

      Comment


      • Hello, can i have an opinion of this photo? Thanks

        Click image for larger version

Name:	2bis.JPG
Views:	62
Size:	559.6 KB
ID:	1128638

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Stefano Cassia View Post
          Hello, can i have an opinion of this photo?
          Dirty, borderline oversharpened/(weak) contrast.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Dirty, borderline oversharpened/(weak) contrast.
            You're right, the dust escaped me. Can it be okay now?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	2bis.JPG
Views:	53
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1128692

            Another thing, can it be considered similar to this other? Another angle but the same sequence

            Click image for larger version

Name:	2bis.JPG
Views:	46
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1128693

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Stefano Cassia View Post
              n1 parts looks soft like windows, and parts oversharpened, like under the wing, and a tad dark
              n2. yes, same sequence=similar, please see the upload quidelines

              Comment


              • Hello, can I have an opinon of these photos? Thanks so much!

                Click image for larger version

Name:	1bis.JPG
Views:	40
Size:	626.2 KB
ID:	1129020

                Click image for larger version

Name:	2bis.JPG
Views:	39
Size:	615.2 KB
ID:	1129021

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Stefano Cassia View Post
                  Hello, can I have an opinon of these photos? Thanks so much!
                  Both soft/blurry and need tighter crops, which will make the softness/blurriness even more apparent.

                  Comment


                  • Hi, I have a question about this rejection, nothing to say about the cropping of the photo, I took wrong references and therefore I was wrong. But how can it be considered similar to this other one? Different date, different light, totally different angle. In the one already loaded it is photographed from the front and from top to bottom, in the second from the tail and from the bottom up. What are the objective criteria for considering a photo similar to an other one?

                    For the avoidance of doubt, I want to clarify that there is no controversy in my request, only the desire to understand.

                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9751381

                    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10278527

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Stefano Cassia View Post
                      Hi, I have a question about this rejection, nothing to say about the cropping of the photo, I took wrong references and therefore I was wrong. But how can it be considered similar to this other one? Different date, different light, totally different angle. In the one already loaded it is photographed from the front and from top to bottom, in the second from the tail and from the bottom up. What are the objective criteria for considering a photo similar to an other one?

                      For the avoidance of doubt, I want to clarify that there is no controversy in my request, only the desire to understand.

                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9751381

                      https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10278527
                      Both show the left side while in the air. This is almost always considered similar.

                      Comment


                      • Okay, but the angle is still very different. I relied exclusively on what is indicated in the upload guidelines:

                        "2.6 Similar

                        Means that you have a similar photo already in the database. Please upload only your best photos, try to be creative. Similar refers to:
                        - a photo taken from the same sequence the same day e. landing, taxiing, ramp parking or take off
                        or
                        - same registration, similar angle or composition or same background taken on different dates.
                        - Close up views and full or partial views of an a/c taken at the same angle, are generally considered similar.

                        If a new upload is of a significantly better quality, we may consider accepting it.

                        We will only accept a certain number of cockpit or window shots taken in the same aircraft (normally no more than two)."


                        The second point speaks of "similar angle" and not "same side", they seem to me two different concepts, I would like to understand, above all in order not to waste time and not to make others waste time in the future.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Stefano Cassia View Post
                          Okay, but the angle is still very different. I relied exclusively on what is indicated in the upload guidelines:

                          "2.6 Similar

                          Means that you have a similar photo already in the database. Please upload only your best photos, try to be creative. Similar refers to:
                          - a photo taken from the same sequence the same day e. landing, taxiing, ramp parking or take off
                          or
                          - same registration, similar angle or composition or same background taken on different dates.
                          - Close up views and full or partial views of an a/c taken at the same angle, are generally considered similar.

                          If a new upload is of a significantly better quality, we may consider accepting it.

                          We will only accept a certain number of cockpit or window shots taken in the same aircraft (normally no more than two)."


                          The second point speaks of "similar angle" and not "same side", they seem to me two different concepts, I would like to understand, above all in order not to waste time and not to make others waste time in the future.
                          You can generally get 4 images accepted of a given registration: 2 in the air (L/R side) and 2 on the ground (L/R side). If there is a significant time between images (think years) or significant difference in location, they might also not be considered similar. If you have doubts in the future best to post here before submitting to the queue.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                            You can generally get 4 images accepted of a given registration: 2 in the air (L/R side) and 2 on the ground (L/R side). If there is a significant time between images (think years) or significant difference in location, they might also not be considered similar. If you have doubts in the future best to post here before submitting to the queue.
                            I had no doubts before this rejection because I relied on what is indicated in the guide. Which says differently from what has been said now. That's fine for me and there are no problems, but wouldn't it be much better to implement the guide with the correct and up-to-date information?

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Stefano Cassia View Post

                              I had no doubts before this rejection because I relied on what is indicated in the guide. Which says differently from what has been said now. That's fine for me and there are no problems, but wouldn't it be much better to implement the guide with the correct and up-to-date information?
                              The guide is correct, so does not need to be updated. I have not stated anything 'different', only (hopefully) given you a clearer idea of how the guidelines are applied in practice.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X