Originally posted by aviationhk
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mohit Purswani - Post screening feedback/advice
Collapse
X
-
-
Hello,
Appreciate help with below rejections. The common theme is JPEG compression issues.
Rejected due to JPEG compression artefacts. Screener commented the file size is low. Should I increase the resolution when I re-edit? Photo is sharp & taken in excellent conditions, processing was minimal.
Rejected for JPEG compression artefacts. Where is the compression evident in these pics? What do I need to do differently in the editing process?
Thank you.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi folks,
Where are the compression artefacts located? I’m not sure. Thank you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by aviationhk View PostHello,
Surprised this got a dark/underexposed rejection. See link below.
Worth appealing? If not, then I suppose 5-10 increase in brightness plus levels/contrast adjustment should do it?
Thank you.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello,
Surprised this got a dark/underexposed rejection. See link below.
Worth appealing? If not, then I suppose 5-10 increase in brightness plus levels/contrast adjustment should do it?
Thank you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by aviationhk View PostHi all,
How does one attach images so that non-screeners can have a look? When I use upload attachment function I get an error message.
Also anyone can see the photos, just replace "viewqueued" with "viewreject" in the link.
Originally posted by aviationhk View PostHi all,
Can I get corrective feedback for these two rejections.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12148126 - rejected for contrast. I think contrast is too much? Needs more exposure?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12146106 - rejected for under sharpened & contrast. I think more contrast is needed and looks like maybe 30-40% increase in sharpening.
Not a screener but I think contrast is too little for both of these.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Hi all,
Can I get corrective feedback for these two rejections.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12148126 - rejected for contrast. I think contrast is too much? Needs more exposure?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12146106 - rejected for under sharpened & contrast. I think more contrast is needed and looks like maybe 30-40% increase in sharpening.
How does one attach images so that non-screeners can have a look? When I use upload attachment function I get an error message.
Thank you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by aviationhk View PostHi folks,
Seeking feedback for this contrast rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12054362
My proposed solution: Increase brightness/exposure & then adjust contrast accordingly.
I get an error message when trying to upload the picture itself so can only share the rejection link (which I know limits the people that can view the pic to screeners only).
Thank you.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi folks,
Seeking feedback for this contrast rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12054362
My proposed solution: Increase brightness/exposure & then adjust contrast accordingly.
I get an error message when trying to upload the picture itself so can only share the rejection link (which I know limits the people that can view the pic to screeners only).
Thank you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by aviationhk View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by aviationhk View PostHi,
Can I get feedback please for below rejected photo?
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
All clear on the undersharpened comment, for contrast is less needed? It looks rather dark underneath the wings so I think less is needed. Thx.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
Can I get feedback please for below rejected photo?
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
All clear on the undersharpened comment, for contrast is less needed? It looks rather dark underneath the wings so I think less is needed. Thx.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: