Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pablo Gonzalez - Prescreening

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    For a change that insignificant, it is at the screener's discretion as to whether it qualifies as hot. Again, it seems you are a little desperate to skip the queue.. is it really that important that a static museum piece have hot screening? Although it may have the potential to technically qualify, it's not really in the spirit of the purpose of hot screening, which is to provide FR24 with the most updated image for use on the app. You're free to exploit the loopholes, but will need to live with the rejections of such borderline cases.
    Okay, Im not desperate. Im just making sure that Im uploading a hot photo, as the rules that I have been always following. It was my first time shooting at a museum, so I thought that it was like other airplanes.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post
    Today i got this rejected for "Invalid hot" https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9477476, isnt a new sticker added hot?

    Latest one: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9222465
    For a change that insignificant, it is at the screener's discretion as to whether it qualifies as hot. Again, it seems you are a little desperate to skip the queue.. is it really that important that a static museum piece have hot screening? Although it may have the potential to technically qualify, it's not really in the spirit of the purpose of hot screening, which is to provide FR24 with the most updated image for use on the app. You're free to exploit the loopholes, but will need to live with the rejections of such borderline cases.

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Today i got this rejected for "Invalid hot" https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9477476, isnt a new sticker added hot?

    Latest one: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9222465

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    You didn't include the image you were planning to upload in your original post, so I had no idea what the previous image was being compared to.

    Technically a refresh more than a new paint scheme, but if you are that desperate to skip the queue we would probably accept it as hot.
    Okay thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

    If you look closelly you will notice that it is different:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	43032_1585659598.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	23.2 KB
ID:	1123442Click image for larger version

Name:	41-30338 2.jpg
Views:	13
Size:	53.4 KB
ID:	1123446
    It has been fully painted again, in the example the spanish military logo is now in the yellow side. And lots of differences are visible too, the "waves" in the bottom for example.
    You didn't include the image you were planning to upload in your original post, so I had no idea what the previous image was being compared to.

    Technically a refresh more than a new paint scheme, but if you are that desperate to skip the queue we would probably accept it as hot.

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Which 'new paint job' are you referring to?
    If you look closelly you will notice that it is different:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	43032_1585659598.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	23.2 KB
ID:	1123442Click image for larger version

Name:	41-30338 2.jpg
Views:	13
Size:	53.4 KB
ID:	1123446
    It has been fully painted again, in the example the spanish military logo is now in the yellow side. And lots of differences are visible too, the "waves" in the bottom for example.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post
    Hello all!
    Would this new paint job apply as hot? It has been completely changed, different colors used (blue in the botton) and the stripes scheme.
    The newerest one accepted is this: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9674234
    Which 'new paint job' are you referring to?

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Hello all!
    Would this new paint job apply as hot? It has been completely changed, different colors used (blue in the botton) and the stripes scheme.
    The newerest one accepted is this: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9674234


    Regards!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post
    Hello! Can I get prescreening advice on these two photos? Thank you in advance
    Images are both blurry. This is not fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Hello! Can I get prescreening advice on these two photos? Thank you in advance

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ggdfz (2).jpg
Views:	44
Size:	638.5 KB
ID:	1121970Click image for larger version

Name:	gezuw.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	631.9 KB
ID:	1121971
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. soft, overprocessed (way too much NR)
    2. borderline oversharpned/compression

    Neither would be similar for me.
    Perfect, thank you so much Dana, Have a good day!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post
    Hello all!

    Id like an opinion about these two photos. Mainly if they are similar to the accepted ones.

    B787 https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9973948
    ATR72 https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10100023

    Regards!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	210821 (21).jpg
Views:	47
Size:	638.3 KB
ID:	1121744
    Click image for larger version Name:	210821 (269).jpg Views:	0 Size:	847.8 KB ID:	1121741
    1. soft, overprocessed (way too much NR)
    2. borderline oversharpned/compression

    Neither would be similar for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Hello all!

    Id like an opinion about these two photos. Mainly if they are similar to the accepted ones.

    B787 https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9973948
    ATR72 https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10100023

    Regards!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	210821 (21).jpg
Views:	47
Size:	638.3 KB
ID:	1121744
    Click image for larger version  Name:	210821 (269).jpg Views:	0 Size:	847.8 KB ID:	1121741
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    It was rejected by two screeners, and my opinion is just one, so at this point you're down 1-2 I can't see anything either way that tells me an appeal should be accepted or denied, so your call really.
    Okay, thank yo so much Dana, have a good day!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

    It is just the name.. for use this thread in future occasions.
    In this case, should I appeal? I just want to know it, for not appeal every single photo.
    It was rejected by two screeners, and my opinion is just one, so at this point you're down 1-2 I can't see anything either way that tells me an appeal should be accepted or denied, so your call really.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X