Originally posted by PabloGlez
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pablo Gonzalez - Prescreening
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Pretty sure that's an editing halo rather than "light on these stands hit so hard" halo since it follows the shape of the fuselage.
If you want to send/post the raw file, I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
What I meant about "light on these stands hit so hard" is because, I had to overexpose the photo because if I follow only the exposure of the fuselage all the black tones of the background are so hard in the histogram. If you check it, you´ll see even overexposing the photo at firsts, blacks are so strong. And my theory about the halo is because the light hits hard the fuselage and produced it.
At eyesight isnt even visible.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PabloGlez View PostHello crew!
I would like to have pre-screening on these two photos.
My main concern is the sky, because the light on these stands hit so hard and the reflection on the fuselage cause a kind of halo.
Thanks in advance! Pablo.
If you want to send/post the raw file, I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by PabloGlez View PostHello crew! I had this photo rejected, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10664547 and I wanted to know which is the exact problem to fix it, or maybe if it has chances to be accepted when appealed. It's regular photo with normal edition process, looks like a fake gradient in the sky but is the original gradient.. I can attach the original one if needed. Thanks in advance!
Originally posted by MarkLawrence View PostI am not a screener, but I see a couple of things I have outlined - the first is something at the top of the image that is very very defined - maybe a dust spot, maybe a fiber
Leave a comment:
-
I am not a screener, but I see a couple of things I have outlined - the first is something at the top of the image that is very very defined - maybe a dust spot, maybe a fiber - and then the second issue looking like banding in the sky above the aircraft . Just my opinion.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello crew! I had this photo rejected, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10664547 and I wanted to know which is the exact problem to fix it, or maybe if it has chances to be accepted when appealed. It's regular photo with normal edition process, looks like a fake gradient in the sky but is the original gradient.. I can attach the original one if needed. Thanks in advance!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PabloGlezHello Crew!
I would like to have a prescreening on this one, I have doubts about obstruction with the light trail in the front and the stair in the landing gear.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PabloGlez View PostHello crew!
Recently this Vueling broke the front landing gear (visible inclination on the photo) and had the runway closed because of that, does it qualify as accident category and hot? Or none of this?
Leave a comment:
-
Hello crew!
Recently this Vueling broke the front landing gear (visible inclination on the photo) and had the runway closed because of that, does it qualify as accident category and hot? Or none of this?
El problema ya está resuelto, pero ha obligado a retrasar despegues y aterrizajes en Gando y otros aeropuertos
Thanks in advance!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PabloGlez View PostHello crew!
Today I had this photo rejected (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10369242), should I appeal? The obstuction is minimal.
Thanks in advance!
Leave a comment:
-
Hello crew!
Today I had this photo rejected (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10369242), should I appeal? The obstuction is minimal.
Thanks in advance!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PabloGlez View PostGood morning crew!
I had this photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10291810 rejected for "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing" and i was wondering to know, as it had no comments by the screener, if it is due to the sky (This weird shadow line caused by a top cloud) or noise reduction that does not look a big problem for me. I do not want to abuse appeals, it is just to know what to fix or appeal in case that is fine.
Thanks in advance!
Pablo Gonzalez de Leon
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Pablo,
It looks like you have over used a reduce noise filter taking away some details.
Happy to try and help with an original! Also the vehicles at the front might cause a rejection due to distraction but thats up-to screeners to decide.
Conor
Leave a comment:
-
Good morning crew!
I had this photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10291810 rejected for "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing" and i was wondering to know, as it had no comments by the screener, if it is due to the sky (This weird shadow line caused by a top cloud) or noise reduction that does not look a big problem for me. I do not want to abuse appeals, it is just to know what to fix or appeal in case that is fine.
Thanks in advance!
Pablo Gonzalez de Leon
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: