Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oslplanespotting - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    When just the top of tail is missing like here, yes it's a cut-off rejection
    My apologies Alex .. I thought it was acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    When just the top of tail is missing like here, yes it's a cut-off rejection

    Contrast is too dull for me on the 330

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post

    From other similar shots I've seen on JP they've always shifted the plane down in the frame to include the top of the tail
    Incorrect - there are plenty of images that are of that style above - as long as the aircraft is centered.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Thanks!

    Is this one better?

    Click image for larger version Name:	rsz_2img_7208_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	736.0 KB ID:	1154961


    And is this Cutoff ok?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz__dsc0461_edited.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	613.4 KB
ID:	1154964
    From other similar shots I've seen on JP they've always shifted the plane down in the frame to include the top of the tail

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    1st one shouzld be ok even if contrast sin'r optimal.
    2nd has strong chances of rejection due to dull contrast

    Kind Regards
    Alex
    Thanks!

    Is this one better?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_2img_7208_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	736.0 KB ID:	1154961


    And is this Cutoff ok?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz__dsc0461_edited.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	613.4 KB
ID:	1154964

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    1st one shouzld be ok even if contrast sin'r optimal.
    2nd has strong chances of rejection due to dull contrast

    Kind Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    A bit dark/flat contrast.
    Hello,

    Is these photos ok? Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_img_7135_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	758.2 KB ID:	1154909

    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_7188_edited.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	710.4 KB
ID:	1154910

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Sorry! I mean upload without any photo-specific category. Like night shot etc.

    Would it be acceptable as that?

    Thanks in advantage and a happy new year to you!
    A bit dark/flat contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Not sure what you mean. What is 'original'?
    Sorry! I mean upload without any photo-specific category. Like night shot etc.

    Would it be acceptable as that?

    Thanks in advantage and a happy new year to you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Ok thanks, would be acceptable as a "original" shot?
    Not sure what you mean. What is 'original'?

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Not really night shot.
    Ok thanks, would be acceptable as a "original" shot?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Thanks! Is this one ok as nightshot?
    Not really night shot.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. soft, dark, overprocessed. yes night shot.
    2. borderline soft/horizon
    3. motive
    Thanks! Is this one ok as nightshot? Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_2769_edited_2_–_kopi_2 (1).jpg
Views:	79
Size:	753.6 KB
ID:	1151652

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    How about these 3? Is the Wideroe ok as a night shot?
    1. soft, dark, overprocessed. yes night shot.
    2. borderline soft/horizon
    3. motive

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Borderline contrast.
    How about these 3? Is the Wideroe ok as a night shot?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz__dsc0762_edited.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	486.9 KB
ID:	1151205

    Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_img_2038_edited_3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	908.1 KB ID:	1151203

    Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_img_2081_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	838.6 KB ID:	1151204

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X