Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oslplanespotting - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. ok for me
    2-3. borderline soft (right side)



    Without further information why it would be, I could not say.

    Sorry I forgot the link,
    It's because the change of this livery
    LN-ESS | Bcker 131 Jungmann | Private | asgeir westgaard | JetPhotos and how it looks now

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post


      Sorry I forgot the link,
      It's because the change of this livery
      LN-ESS | Bcker 131 Jungmann | Private | asgeir westgaard | JetPhotos and how it looks now
      Yes, that should qualify as hot.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

        Yes, that should qualify as hot.
        Thanks, are these photos acceptable?
        Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_imgp0957_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	462.7 KB ID:	1129040
        Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_1imgp0890_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	503.8 KB ID:	1129039
        Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_2img_3525_edited (1).jpg Views:	0 Size:	477.6 KB ID:	1129038

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

          Thanks, are these photos acceptable?
          There are issues with dust spots, overprocessing, and (slight) underexposure.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            There are issues with dust spots, overprocessing, and (slight) underexposure.
            Thanks,

            does these look good now?
            Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_imgp0957_edited_edited.jpg
Views:	109
Size:	495.7 KB
ID:	1129168
            Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_imgp0890_edited_edited.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	525.4 KB
ID:	1129167
            Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_1img_3525_edited_edited (1).jpg Views:	0 Size:	493.3 KB ID:	1129160

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

              Thanks,

              does these look good now?
              Might run into some problems with processing (editing halos), but otherwise would be ok for me.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                Might run into some problems with processing (editing halos), but otherwise would be ok for me.
                Thanks, do you think these two looks ok?
                Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_1img_4202_edited.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	429.2 KB
ID:	1129509Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_4184_edited.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	614.7 KB
ID:	1129510

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

                  Thanks, do you think these two looks ok?
                  1. horizon, soft, dark/contrast
                  2. horizon, dark/contrast

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    1. horizon, soft, dark/contrast
                    2. horizon, dark/contrast
                    Thanks, is this photo ok? Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_12img_3543_edited.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	498.5 KB
ID:	1129591

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

                      Thanks, is this photo ok?
                      A bit dark/soft/low in the frame, but should be fixable.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                        A bit dark/soft/low in the frame, but should be fixable.
                        Thanks, do you think this one is acceptable? Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1491_edited.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	700.2 KB
ID:	1129621

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

                          Thanks, do you think this one is acceptable?
                          Would be rejected for horizon and obstruction.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                            Would be rejected for horizon and obstruction.
                            Thanks, is these photos ok? Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_1img_2782_edited.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	700.2 KB
ID:	1130855

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1673_edited_edited.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	494.2 KB
ID:	1130856

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1579_edited.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1130857

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

                              Thanks, is these photos ok?
                              1. soft, borderline dark/horizon
                              3. soft, horizon

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                                1. soft, borderline dark/horizon
                                3. soft, horizon
                                Thanks, also are this photo ok?
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_1imgp2135_edited2.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	508.7 KB
ID:	1131184

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X