Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oslplanespotting - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Hello and thanks for the pre-screen, is this photo OK you think? and would this photo be considered as special colors/livery?
    Borderline contrast. Not Special Scheme.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Slightly dark, but otherwise ok for me.
    Hello and thanks for the pre-screen, is this photo OK you think? and would this photo be considered as special colors/livery? Click image for larger version  Name:	rsz_img_2179_edited.jpg Views:	0 Size:	676.0 KB ID:	1123037

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Can you prescreen this?
    Slightly dark, but otherwise ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Maybe a bit soft, but would be ok for me.
    Can you prescreen this?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_imgp3396_edited.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	753.5 KB
ID:	1122706

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Maybe a bit soft, but would be ok for me.
    Hello, Thanks for the pre-screen

    Can you please help me correct this Info? Edwin didn't respond to my tread.

    LN-ASB | Reims-Cessna F172M Skyhawk | Private | OSL Planespotting | JetPhotos
    Fix airline to Kilen Sjoflyklubb my correct info button doesn't work.

    And prescreen the post under thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Do you think this photo is acceptable?
    Maybe a bit soft, but would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Too wide, but definitely not backlit.

    Do you think this photo is acceptable?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1044_edited (1).jpg
Views:	154
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1122093

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Ok, but is this angle considered as a backlit?
    Too wide, but definitely not backlit.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Ok, but is this angle considered as a backlit Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1044.jpg
Views:	187
Size:	993.8 KB
ID:	1122023 ?
    Too wide, but definitely not backlit.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Borderline, but also seems to have some DOF issues.
    Ok, but is this angle considered as a backlit Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1044.jpg
Views:	187
Size:	993.8 KB
ID:	1122023 ?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    How about this, I tried another photo I got. Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1133_edited (1).jpg
Views:	183
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1122014
    Borderline, but also seems to have some DOF issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Still borderline at best. Not sure the whole frame is actually in focus.
    How about this, I tried another photo I got. Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1133_edited (1).jpg
Views:	183
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1122014

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Is this ok?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1066_edited_2_edited.jpg
Views:	189
Size:	986.4 KB
ID:	1121957
    Still borderline at best. Not sure the whole frame is actually in focus.

    Leave a comment:


  • OslPlaneSpotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Still soft, but horizon would be ok for me.
    Is this ok?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1066_edited_2_edited.jpg
Views:	189
Size:	986.4 KB
ID:	1121957

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by OslPlaneSpotting View Post

    Ok, is this better?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	rsz_img_1066_edited_2.jpg
Views:	186
Size:	971.5 KB
ID:	1121950
    Still soft, but horizon would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X