Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

janchorobik - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • janchorobik - prescreening request / editing advice

    Hey everyone, I recently got a bunch of rejections, so I'd very much appreciate hearing some advice before trying again with these 4 shots:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	2021-06-22 - 175134.jpg Views:	0 Size:	673.9 KB ID:	1121302Click image for larger version  Name:	2021-07-09 - 172523.jpg Views:	0 Size:	543.7 KB ID:	1121301Click image for larger version  Name:	2021-07-09 - 180839.jpg Views:	0 Size:	379.9 KB ID:	1121303 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_42161.jpg
Views:	461
Size:	354.2 KB
ID:	1121300

    Thanks
    Jan

  • #2
    Originally posted by janchorobik View Post
    Hey everyone, I recently got a bunch of rejections, so I'd very much appreciate hearing some advice before trying again with these 4 shots:
    1. borderline dark, but ok for me
    2. color, borderline noise/vignetting
    3. borderline soft/contrast
    4. overprocessed, borderline soft/contrast

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks very much, are they better now?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	2021-06-22 - 175134.jpg
Views:	311
Size:	700.5 KB
ID:	1121363Click image for larger version

Name:	2021-07-09 - 172523.jpg
Views:	302
Size:	416.1 KB
ID:	1121362Click image for larger version

Name:	2021-07-09 - 180839.jpg
Views:	307
Size:	396.1 KB
ID:	1121361Click image for larger version

Name:	2021-07-09 - 180723.jpg
Views:	306
Size:	370.3 KB
ID:	1121360

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by janchorobik View Post
        Thanks very much, are they better now?
        1. as before
        2. contrast, overprocessed, borderline vignetting
        3-4. soft, borderline contrast

        Comment


        • #5
          Hey again, could I please get some feedback on these two?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	2021-11-21 - 095408.jpg
Views:	153
Size:	552.7 KB
ID:	1128771Click image for larger version

Name:	2021-12-12 - 114539.jpg
Views:	145
Size:	697.1 KB
ID:	1128772

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by janchorobik View Post
            Hey again, could I please get some feedback on these two?
            1. borderline overprocessed/heat hazed, though the latter would be ok for me. Check the sky for specks/birds as well.
            2. contrast

            Comment


            • #7
              Hi, are they better now?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	2021-11-21 - 095408.jpg
Views:	126
Size:	542.6 KB
ID:	1129451Click image for larger version

Name:	2021-12-12 - 114539.jpg
Views:	127
Size:	727.1 KB
ID:	1129452

              And may I ask in what way is the overprocessed meant? I'm not really used to that kind of lighting, thus I edited the A340 photo just very slightly, so what could I do better in the future?

              Also, Happy new year!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by janchorobik View Post
                Hi, are they better now?
                Still borderline for heat haze/contrast.

                Originally posted by janchorobik View Post
                And may I ask in what way is the overprocessed meant?
                Editing halos (on tail).

                Originally posted by janchorobik View Post
                I'm not really used to that kind of lighting, thus I edited the A340 photo just very slightly, so what could I do better in the future?
                Not much you could do yourself, the air was just a bit hazy at that time.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Thanks for the feedback, I tried uploading, but both got rejected for dust (only). Is there something I'm missing or is it a wrong rejection?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by janchorobik View Post
                    Thanks for the feedback, I tried uploading, but both got rejected for dust (only). Is there something I'm missing or is it a wrong rejection?
                    Not really visible imho, but yes there are dust spots on both.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I can't believe you can see them so well, especially in such a small photo, well, at least I'm discovering new functions in Lightroom to conquer the neverending rejections

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hey, thanks so much for the previous help, I'm very happy both got accepted!

                        Could I also get an opinion on this photo? I'm not really sure if it's even worth uploading, but I didn't want to just throw my beloved Fokker away And would this be considered a night photo?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	2022-02-07 - 164915.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	586.8 KB
ID:	1131492

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by janchorobik View Post
                          Hey, thanks so much for the previous help, I'm very happy both got accepted!

                          Could I also get an opinion on this photo? I'm not really sure if it's even worth uploading, but I didn't want to just throw my beloved Fokker away And would this be considered a night photo?
                          Night shot, yes, but too dark to be accepted.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Ok, is this better?

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	2022-02-07 - 164915.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	628.2 KB
ID:	1131502

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by janchorobik View Post
                              Ok, is this better?
                              Still borderline for dark/contrast, but might have a chance.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X