Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

screening help for ronen_fefer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
    thanks for the feedback here is my second attempt could you have a look at it as well ?
    Soft, dirty, overprocessed/vignetting.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post

      Contrast/compression imo
      What do you mean by compression in this photo?

      Comment


      • Hi will this photo be accepted as a silhouette photo?

        https://www.flickr.com/gp/186012304@N06/HVEw8YLMhp
        sorry had to upload a link because i am unable to upload the photo here.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
          Hi will this photo be accepted as a silhouette photo?

          https://www.flickr.com/gp/186012304@N06/HVEw8YLMhp
          sorry had to upload a link because i am unable to upload the photo here.
          ?

          Comment


          • To quote from the "State of the forum" post pinned at the top:

            "As such, I would like to request that you refrain from posting any new pre-screening requests until at least such time as the image attachment issues is resolved. Post-screening requests with ?links to rejected images or general editing advice is ok."

            Comment


            • Originally posted by MarkLawrence View Post
              To quote from the "State of the forum" post pinned at the top:

              "As such, I would like to request that you refrain from posting any new pre-screening requests until at least such time as the image attachment issues is resolved. Post-screening requests with ?links to rejected images or general editing advice is ok."
              Don't think too many people are taking the time to actually read all the posts

              Comment


              • Hi everyone the following photo was rejected for softness and uncetering. The problem is how do i know that the sharpness is correct since there are no visible references?
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
                  Hi everyone the following photo was rejected for softness and uncetering. The problem is how do i know that the sharpness is correct since there are no visible references?
                  The aircraft is a visible reference. It is soft.

                  Comment


                  • Hello, i need help with figuring out if the contrast and warmth in the photo are acceptable. Now, the photo was taken a few minutes after sunset, so there is no direct sunlight on the photo. So will it count as a night photo and be accepted?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
                      Hello, i need help with figuring out if the contrast and warmth in the photo are acceptable. Now, the photo was taken a few minutes after sunset, so there is no direct sunlight on the photo. So will it count as a night photo and be accepted?

                      https://drive.google.com/file/d/1naY...usp=drive_link
                      Not a screener, but I’m quite sure the lack of sunlight renders the contrast unfixable in this case.

                      Comment


                      • Hello again, could someone help me out here? The following photo was rejected due to wrong categories. Now i have used the auto-fill feature and it seems to be correct. what am i missing?
                        JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!

                        if impossible to open, the aircraft registration is OE-LNK a boeing 757-200PCF of DHL Austria.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
                          Hello again, could someone help me out here? The following photo was rejected due to wrong categories. Now i have used the auto-fill feature and it seems to be correct. what am i missing?
                          JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!

                          if impossible to open, the aircraft registration is OE-LNK a boeing 757-200PCF of DHL Austria.
                          The category "Cargo" should be manually chosen for this aircraft. Auto-fill doesn't automatically click categories.

                          EDIT: Wrong categories alone don't directly cause a rejection, you must have been given other reasons for rejection. The category issue acts as a reminder, and if there are no issues other than missing categories, the photo will be accepted.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
                            Hello again, could someone help me out here? The following photo was rejected due to wrong categories. Now i have used the auto-fill feature and it seems to be correct. what am i missing?
                            JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!

                            if impossible to open, the aircraft registration is OE-LNK a boeing 757-200PCF of DHL Austria.
                            This is a Cargo aircraft.

                            Comment


                            • Hey everyone, I’ve got a rejection on an Austrian a320 OE-LBK for under sharpening (cmos as well but it’s my mistake for missing it) so my question is how do I know if it’s under sharpened, I looked at the reg and the name of the aircraft but it seems to be fine at 1280px. Any help?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ronen_fefer View Post
                                Hey everyone, I’ve got a rejection on an Austrian a320 OE-LBK for under sharpening (cmos as well but it’s my mistake for missing it) so my question is how do I know if it’s under sharpened, I looked at the reg and the name of the aircraft but it seems to be fine at 1280px. Any help?
                                It would help to see the image in question.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X