Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jag_guar Prescreening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
    Is this better?
    Not really.

    Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
    Also, tweaked this one a bit; how does it look re: noise/contrast?
    Noise is ok, but still likely a dark/contrast rejection.

    Comment


    • #32
      OK thanks, I won't persist with that one. Can I get a prescreen of these photos please. All were taken in the golden hour on different days and I am unsure whether brightness is considered adequate. Also, let me know if all of these would qualify as night shots. Thanks.
      Click image for larger version

Name:	2021_07_21_9_74-2.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	702.3 KB
ID:	1127206Click image for larger version

Name:	2015_08_09_9_67.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	684.1 KB
ID:	1127207Click image for larger version

Name:	2021_09_29_9_16.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	653.4 KB
ID:	1127208Click image for larger version

Name:	2021_09_18_9_191.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	682.3 KB
ID:	1127209

      Comment


      • #33
        The Air France needs a bit more exposure, the others look fine to me

        Regards
        Alex

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
          The Air France needs a bit more exposure, the others look fine to me

          Regards
          Alex
          Thanks Alex. Should I tick 'night shot' for these?

          Comment


          • #35
            Hello, I need help with a couple of rejections.

            1. Air Inuit: Can you explain what the specific issue with over processing is. I applied only minimal editing to this photo and had it prescreened in this forum as well to be sure. If there are any visible issues with the image it would be helpful to know what they are and what can I do to avoid them in the future.

            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9629098

            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Tail somewhat soft, but would be acceptable for me.
            2. Copa: I understand the horizon reason but unclear what categories are wrong or missing (I don't think there is a way for me to see what categories I selected during original upload, once the photo has been screened, is there?) - can you confirm please.

            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9629264

            Lastly, once I make the corrections (e.g. horizon, categories), would I need to wait 2 weeks for queue to clear and then re-upload from scratch or is there a way to make updates to a rejected photo? Thanks.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
              Hello, I need help with a couple of rejections.

              1. Air Inuit: Can you explain what the specific issue with over processing is. I applied only minimal editing to this photo and had it prescreened in this forum as well to be sure. If there are any visible issues with the image it would be helpful to know what they are and what can I do to avoid them in the future.
              Very light editing halos on the treeline/tail. Not really an issue for me, but the screeners who saw your image disagreed. Probably caused by shadow/highlight/vibrance/etc. tool in editing.

              Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
              2. Copa: I understand the horizon reason but unclear what categories are wrong or missing (I don't think there is a way for me to see what categories I selected during original upload, once the photo has been screened, is there?) - can you confirm please.
              Special scheme.

              Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
              Lastly, once I make the corrections (e.g. horizon, categories), would I need to wait 2 weeks for queue to clear and then re-upload from scratch or is there a way to make updates to a rejected photo? Thanks.
              Please resubmit to the regular queue.

              Comment


              • #37
                Ok, thanks. Just to be clear, for Copa - should it be a special scheme or not (if I remember correctly I thought I did tick 'special scheme' box)?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
                  Ok, thanks. Just to be clear, for Copa - should it be a special scheme or not (if I remember correctly I thought I did tick 'special scheme' box)?
                  Yes Copa is a Special Scheme category, please tick it

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Calvin L View Post

                    Yes Copa is a Special Scheme category, please tick it
                    Thanks.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Hi, got another 'contrast' rejection.

                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9654249

                      As the lighting conditions were decent (and another photo from same set was accepted), I hope this one is not a lost cause and can be corrected with editing. Attaching below my attempt to correct rejected photo (with slight tone curve adjustments) - what do you think? Does it look better or are there any 'overprocessing' issues noticeable now? Thanks.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	2021_09_18_9_217-3.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	704.7 KB
ID:	1127795

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
                        Hi, got another 'contrast' rejection.

                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9654249

                        As the lighting conditions were decent (and another photo from same set was accepted), I hope this one is not a lost cause and can be corrected with editing. Attaching below my attempt to correct rejected photo (with slight tone curve adjustments) - what do you think? Does it look better or are there any 'overprocessing' issues noticeable now? Thanks.
                        Looks more like an underexposure problem than with contrast. Try brightening it up a bit, though adding some contrast might help as well. There is also a sharpening halo visible around the tail as well as at least one dust spot.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          How's this? I added a tad of exposure and contrast, reduced sharpening and removed what could be one of the dust spots above door #3 (although had to look really hard for them and can't even be sure it was a dust spot - if you still see any, can you please point them out for me). Thanks.
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	2021_09_18_9_217-4.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	709.2 KB
ID:	1127827

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
                            How's this? I added a tad of exposure and contrast, reduced sharpening and removed what could be one of the dust spots above door #3 (although had to look really hard for them and can't even be sure it was a dust spot - if you still see any, can you please point them out for me).
                            Slight improvement, but all issues remain. Dust spot:

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	image_44506.jpeg
Views:	34
Size:	722.6 KB
ID:	1127842

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Hi, would love an opinion on these photos please. Specific concerns are: brightness, softness and centering/horizon but of course any other feedback is welcome. Thank you.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	2018_09_09_9_85.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	639.3 KB
ID:	1128008Click image for larger version

Name:	2018_09_09_9_91.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	647.0 KB
ID:	1128009Click image for larger version

Name:	2018_09_09_9_103-2.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	672.8 KB
ID:	1128010Click image for larger version

Name:	2018_09_09_9_1.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	969.0 KB
ID:	1128011Click image for larger version

Name:	2018_09_09_9_23.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	513.2 KB
ID:	1128012

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
                                Hi, would love an opinion on these photos please. Specific concerns are: brightness, softness and centering/horizon but of course any other feedback is welcome.
                                1-3. soft/blurry, borderline contrast
                                4. borderline contrast/horizon (maybe a bit ccw)
                                5. soft/blurry, contrast

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X