Jag_guar Prescreening advice

[dlowwa]

Hi, requesting prescreening for these please. Specific concerns: 1 - crop/motive; 2 - motive/obstruction; 3 - motive (does it work a 'tower' or 'terminal' or 'ramp' category?); 4 - crop/motive (is tighter crop needed on the towers?); 5 - contrast/ possibly backlit? Thanks.

Motive would be an issue for most of them. 2-3 might work, but the cropping is not great; cropping ok on the last one but there is a lot of clutter.

[Jag_guar]

Hi, requesting prescreening for these please. Specific concerns: 1 - crop/motive; 2 - motive/obstruction; 3 - motive (does it work a 'tower' or 'terminal' or 'ramp' category?); 4 - crop/motive (is tighter crop needed on the towers?); 5 - contrast/ possibly backlit? Thanks.

[dlowwa]

Hi, looking for clarification on reason for this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10871623
I believe over processed comment usually refers to halos, however I don't see any obvious ones here.

I don't see any issue with the processing, but there is some vignetting in the corners.

[Jag_guar]

Hi, looking for clarification on reason for this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10871623
I believe over processed comment usually refers to halos, however I don't see any obvious ones here.

[Jag_guar]

1. borderline contrast. also seems to be something in the sky, maybe a reflection
2. horizon, contrast. not obstruction, but there's a lot of clutter.
3. borderline overexposed/soft/heat hazed
4. borderline horizon

Thanks. Re-obstruction, I meant #4. I take it there is no issue with left engine and part of the wing being obstructed, correct?

[dlowwa]

Thanks. Is this better? And can I get pre-screening on the other ones below as well please. 2&3 were edits of similar rejects for color and/or contrast and for the last one I'm wondering if it would be considered obstructed.

1. borderline contrast. also seems to be something in the sky, maybe a reflection
2. horizon, contrast. not obstruction, but there's a lot of clutter.
3. borderline overexposed/soft/heat hazed
4. borderline horizon

[Jag_guar]

Possibly. Green tint/flat contrast. Looks like it was shot through a window.

Thanks. Is this better? And can I get pre-screening on the other ones below as well please. 2&3 were edits of similar rejects for color and/or contrast and for the last one I'm wondering if it would be considered obstructed.

[dlowwa]

Hi, looking for recommendation on how this one can be recovered (if at all): https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10861953
Thanks.

Possibly. Green tint/flat contrast. Looks like it was shot through a window.

[Jag_guar]

Hi, looking for recommendation on how this one can be recovered (if at all): https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10861953
Thanks.

[dlowwa]

Thanks.
Re: #3: Any advice on how it may be improved, if at all?
Re: #1: Motive is the terminal overview. I personally like the one the got rejected, showing more of the building and its setting (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10838452). Is there another in-between crop that may work in your opinion?

1. very poor crop/view
2. not much you can do with the bright exterior light

[Jag_guar]

1. motive
2. quite soft towards the edges
3. contrast/exposure
4. dark/contrast

Thanks.
Re: #3: Any advice on how it may be improved, if at all?
Re: #1: Motive is the terminal overview. I personally like the one the got rejected, showing more of the building and its setting (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10838452). Is there another in-between crop that may work in your opinion?

[dlowwa]

Hi, requesting pre-screening of these please. All were previously rejected; I have made some corrections and wondering if these are now acceptable. If not, would appreciate suggestions for further corrections. Thank you.

1. Was rejected for obstruction/subject too far. Cropped tighter, reducing foreground clutter.

2. Was rejected for soft; added sharpness
3. Was rejected for contrast; added a bit of contrast
4. Was rejected for contrast; reduced a bit of contrast

1. motive
2. quite soft towards the edges
3. contrast/exposure
4. dark/contrast

[Jag_guar]

Hi, requesting pre-screening of these please. All were previously rejected; I have made some corrections and wondering if these are now acceptable. If not, would appreciate suggestions for further corrections. Thank you.

1. Was rejected for obstruction/subject too far. Cropped tighter, reducing foreground clutter.

2. Was rejected for soft; added sharpness
3. Was rejected for contrast; added a bit of contrast
4. Was rejected for contrast; reduced a bit of contrast

[Jag_guar]

Centering fine. Motive/obstruction maybe ok if explained in comments on the upload. Not really accident category.

Thanks, I'll give it a try.

[dlowwa]

Hi,
I consider submitting this image as an 'accident' category (this would be a new reg in the database). The aircraft blew a tire on the runway and is being towed to the hangar; the damaged left landing gear is being propped by the pump truck with a pallet, so both, the tug and the 2 ramp agents in front of the plane are forming a part of the motive.
With this, I have two questions:
1) Is centering OK or should the tug be cropped out?
2) Would 2 agents be considered obstructions in this case leading to a rejection?

Centering fine. Motive/obstruction maybe ok if explained in comments on the upload. Not really accident category.