Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jag_guar Prescreening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post


    Thank you.

    Any opinion on this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10374666

    I had a few other pictures from this sequence with same lighting conditions accepted and this one looks OK to me so I'm a bit puzzled as to what can be done to improve it, if anything. Appreciate any suggestions.
    Borderline for me. Same issue, you've got some (light) clouds interfering with direct lighting of the aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jag_guar
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    You might be able to get a better edit out of it, but it's more a result of the high cloud cover causing diffuse light, not something editing can usually fix easily.

    Thank you.

    Any opinion on this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10374666

    I had a few other pictures from this sequence with same lighting conditions accepted and this one looks OK to me so I'm a bit puzzled as to what can be done to improve it, if anything. Appreciate any suggestions.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
    Thoughts on this rejection please: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10398376

    Is it fixable by adding contrast?
    You might be able to get a better edit out of it, but it's more a result of the high cloud cover causing diffuse light, not something editing can usually fix easily.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jag_guar
    replied
    Thoughts on this rejection please: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10398376

    Is it fixable by adding contrast?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post

    Ok thanks. How about this one - are backpacks an issue?
    Would certainly be better without.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jag_guar
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yes.
    Ok thanks. How about this one - are backpacks an issue?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
    Hi, would this image be considered obstructed?
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    I see some faces that are identifiable so that could also be an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jag_guar
    replied
    Hi, would this image be considered obstructed?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post

    Thank you, I'll adjust.

    Any advice on this photo? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10321985

    Not sure what needs to be done to improve it...would appreciate any suggestions.
    Slight orange tint (not yellow), but doesn't look that bad to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jag_guar
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Due to the angle of the sun, this qualifies as Night Shot. Reducing the exposure a bit would help.
    Thank you, I'll adjust.

    Any advice on this photo? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10321985

    Not sure what needs to be done to improve it...would appreciate any suggestions.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
    Would like some help with this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10319652
    Can you please clarify the 'wrong categories' reason. If I recall correctly, I did tick off the special scheme which I believe this one qualifies for (special tail paint).
    Any thoughts on overexposure as well? Would it help reducing exposure or would it risk another rejection due to it being too dark?
    Thanks
    Due to the angle of the sun, this qualifies as Night Shot. Reducing the exposure a bit would help.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jag_guar
    replied
    Would like some help with this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10319652
    Can you please clarify the 'wrong categories' reason. If I recall correctly, I did tick off the special scheme which I believe this one qualifies for (special tail paint).
    Any thoughts on overexposure as well? Would it help reducing exposure or would it risk another rejection due to it being too dark?
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Jag_guar
    replied
    Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jag_guar View Post
    Please help with this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10284213
    Any recommendations on framing? Does contrast need to be reduced a bit?
    Contrast and centering are fine. Image has been accepted.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X