Jag_guar Prescreening advice

[dlowwa]

Hi may I get help with this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12206468

What should I be looking for to identify compression artefacts and what is the recommended course of action to prevent or correct them? Thank you.

Sky is a bit noisy, but don't see any compression.

[Jag_guar]

Hi may I get help with this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12206468

What should I be looking for to identify compression artefacts and what is the recommended course of action to prevent or correct them? Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Is this a better (acceptable) crop/framing? Thanks.

Better than before.

[Stanley JH]

Not a screener, but the centering looks weird to me.

[Jag_guar]

Is this a better (acceptable) crop/framing? Thanks.

[dlowwa]

Hello, may I have these 2 pre-screened - first for brightness/contrast and second for framing.

1. contrast
2. cut off

[Jag_guar]

Hello, may I have these 2 pre-screened - first for brightness/contrast and second for framing. Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hello, may I please have these 3 pre-screened for framing/centering. Thanks.

Should be fine.

[AMGEnthusiast63]

Hello, may I please have these 3 pre-screened for framing/centering. Thanks.

1.

2.
3.

Not a screener but 1 is too low in the frame.

[Jag_guar]

Hello, may I please have these 3 pre-screened for framing/centering. Thanks.

1.

2.
3.

[dlowwa]

Hello, may I please have an opinion on a couple of rejections.

1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11922037 this was previously rejected for dust spot as the only reason, which I since corrected. Now it was rejected as soft, which is surprising as the image is sharp with even the finer details clearly visible.

2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11918789 rejected for backlit. I did double-check using the suncalc app and while the angle is steep (the nose of the plane is almost aligned with the sun's direction), the sun still hits the left hand side of the plane so I don't think it can technically be considered backlit.

I would have rejected the first for the same reason, but not the second. Appears not to be backlit.

[Jag_guar]

Hello, may I please have an opinion on a couple of rejections.

1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11922037 this was previously rejected for dust spot as the only reason, which I since corrected. Now it was rejected as soft, which is surprising as the image is sharp with even the finer details clearly visible.

2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11918789 rejected for backlit. I did double-check using the suncalc app and while the angle is steep (the nose of the plane is almost aligned with the sun's direction), the sun still hits the left hand side of the plane so I don't think it can technically be considered backlit.

[dlowwa]

Right, that's why I was asking if you could provide a comment on whether this framing/centering is acceptable. Thank you

In the future you can infer lack of comments means it's ok for me. Save us both some time.

[Jag_guar]

I didn't comment on it.

Right, that's why I was asking if you could provide a comment on whether this framing/centering is acceptable. Thank you

[dlowwa]

Thank you. Can you comment on the centering of #2 please.

I didn't comment on it.