Originally posted by A7-BAJ
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Prescreen Request - A7-BAJ
Collapse
X
-
Hi All,
Hope this Monday is going great for y'all. Woke up to 5 rejections:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Can I get some help w these? I feel like having looked at it several times, before and now after uploading most of them seem decently acceptable and in line with similar photos accepted from this location (Bayfront Park @ SFO - I think this does matter because in general it is a well known harder location to shoot from due to proximity from the runway ( all at 500mm from a mile + away besides the Asiana )). At least the Aer Lingus, Zipair and VS A350 imo should be acceptable, I can't really ascertain the compression or processing rejections - imo no visible haloing or any real indicators as to a rejection on them
I know screeners don't love this argument but I do feel it is somewhat a leg to stand on with this claim but all of them were accepted to PlaneSpotters, which despite having a different screening team and slightly different guidelines is principally a very similar type of mechanism to JP, and largely from my past experience there is a decent correlation between the two sites in verdicts. So getting 5 back to back with different verdicts was a bit of a question.
Would it be worthwhile to appeal any? Any advices would be appreciated
Comment
-
Originally posted by A7-BAJ View PostHi All,
Hope this Monday is going great for y'all. Woke up to 5 rejections:
Can I get some help w these? I feel like having looked at it several times, before and now after uploading most of them seem decently acceptable and in line with similar photos accepted from this location (Bayfront Park @ SFO - I think this does matter because in general it is a well known harder location to shoot from due to proximity from the runway ( all at 500mm from a mile + away besides the Asiana )). At least the Aer Lingus, Zipair and VS A350 imo should be acceptable, I can't really ascertain the compression or processing rejections - imo no visible haloing or any real indicators as to a rejection on them
Would it be worthwhile to appeal any? Any advices would be appreciated
Comment
-
Evening all! Hope December is treating you all well. Was just wondering if I could get some help on this one, namely if the gear being slightly under the wall constitutes a obstruction rejection (looking at previous Bayfront pics at SFO in DB, there are many with so just wondering), or if anything else comes to eye. Thanks!
(I know that technically we aren't supposed to upload queued images, but forums would not let me upload any image files embedded into this message, so this was the only way I could send it over. Sorry!)
Comment
Comment