rafaspotter rejection help

[rafaspotter]

good afternoon, i dont understand this rejection, why the photo is bad quality? does that mean it's unfixable? the dust spots are the weird colored pixels on the sky? can someone please help?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9673558

[dlowwa]

good afternoon, i dont understand this rejection, why the photo is bad quality? does that mean it's unfixable? the dust spots are the weird colored pixels on the sky? can someone please help?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9673558

The screener(s) involved left a comment about dead pixels in the sky, which would be the reason for the quality rejection. If that is in fact the case, it might be difficult to fix.

[rafaspotter]

The screener(s) involved left a comment about dead pixels in the sky, which would be the reason for the quality rejection. If that is in fact the case, it might be difficult to fix.

is this version better? i think i managed to remove all of the dead pixels

[dlowwa]

is this version better? i think i managed to remove all of the dead pixels

Don't see any dead pixels, though there noise reduction is a bit heavy for me.

[rafaspotter]

are these photos acceptable?

[dlowwa]

are these photos acceptable?

A touch oversharpened perhaps, but would be ok for me.

[rafaspotter]

A touch oversharpened perhaps, but would be ok for me.

thanks! is this one ok? im concerned about the horizon. btw, happy new year!

[dlowwa]

thanks! is this one ok? im concerned about the horizon. btw, happy new year!

Can't really tell on the horizon. Contrast is a bit harsh, but otherwise would be ok for me.

[rafaspotter]

soft?

[dlowwa]

soft?

Yes.

[rafaspotter]

i need help with the following images. specially on #2 (color and blurriness) and horizon on #4 and #5

[dlowwa]

i need help with the following images. specially on #2 (color and blurriness) and horizon on #4 and #5

Colour looks ok for 2, and while maybe a bit soft, it is not blurry. 4 might need a touch of CCW rotation, 5 horizon looks ok to me. What do you need with for the others?

[rafaspotter]

Colour looks ok for 2, and while maybe a bit soft, it is not blurry. 4 might need a touch of CCW rotation, 5 horizon looks ok to me. What do you need with for the others?

just a regular pre-screening, i asked about these specific things on #2, #4 and #5 because they were concerning me the most, for the others, i think they would be ok, but i still would like a regular advice/pre-screening on them because i'm not 100% sure.

[dlowwa]

just a regular pre-screening, i asked about these specific things on #2, #4 and #5 because they were concerning me the most, for the others, i think they would be ok, but i still would like a regular advice/pre-screening on them because i'm not 100% sure.

1. borderline heathazed/overexposed
2. borderline soft
3. borderline overexposed
4. soft, borderline horizon
5. borderline soft

[rafaspotter]

pre-screening please?