Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Refusal of missing parts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Refusal of missing parts

    Hi I was refused an image on the grounds of missing parts of the aircraft. I would like to ask why in the database there are many helicopters with cropped props while in my case the image was rejected. In the appeal I was told that the propellers are an integral part but in reality they are often accepted even with cut propellers and in the database there are many examples. Thanks
    Image link rejected:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9698234

  • #2
    Not a screener, but if I were you I would definitely vertically center the frame on the 15-48 registration. Don't be afraid to upload a portrait orientated picture, they are acceptable here. Right now the helicopter just seems off-frame, being cramped up in the upper portion of the frame.
    Cropped images must still be centered,for example like here:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0707.jpg
Views:	270
Size:	930.5 KB
ID:	1128590

    Comment


    • #3
      As mentionné by Panda pilot

      Right now the helicopter just seems off-frame, being cramped up in the upper portion of the frame.
      Cropped images must still be centered.


      By showing more of the rotor blades picture will be more balanced.

      Alex

      Comment


      • #4
        Dear Team!

        I would like to kindly ask you abort this picture: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10297677

        Is this picture entitled for a badge?

        Thank you, and wish you all the best!

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi Zsolt,
          not a screener, but I think you look for the IL96-300PU badge. However, RA-96023 is not a PU version; its a support aircraft with a 160 (VIP) seat cabin.
          Regards AKH
          PD. The question might be wrong in this topic strain.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi, who can help me understand this rejection? 1 backlight: the photo is fstta under an awning and as you can see the light is from the side. 2 contrast, it seems to me not to be lacking it too much as can be seen from the histogram. 3 sharpness seems to me a well detailed photo. where am I wrong or what is requested differently? Thanks for your help https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10358195

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by FUMAGALLI ANDREA View Post
              Hi, who can help me understand this rejection? 1 backlight: the photo is fstta under an awning and as you can see the light is from the side. 2 contrast, it seems to me not to be lacking it too much as can be seen from the histogram. 3 sharpness seems to me a well detailed photo. where am I wrong or what is requested differently? Thanks for your help https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10358195
              Hi, please read here when you get the chance:

              https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

              Rejections that have already been appealed will not be commented on by crew.

              Comment


              • #8
                I appealed without any advice. Since in my opinion the image had no problems I didn't ask for advice before. Here I ask for clarification on the refusal since I have not had any and my doubts remain. In my opinion the image does not suffer from backlight (how do you know if it is inside a curtain and the light is in your favor?) Shade? certainly it is under a tent. The contrast, in my opinion, is not lacking and neither is it too much. the sharpness does not seem to be lacking is well detailed. I thought I could ask these questions in the forum, I didn't ask them a priori because I thought this image didn't have such important problems. Being a few times that I use the forum I am wrong or I did not think it was a problem to ask. Tell me if I'm wrong and I'll do it next time. Thank you

                Comment


                • #9
                  Not a screener but to me it seems the light from the left side is falling on the oppositie part of the helicopter. At least the tail is for me backlit due to angle of the light and the tail also looks soft to me.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Thank you for your answer.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X