I don not know how to adjust this photo so that it can meet the request of JP. This photo is the first time for me to take a photo of A380, so in my view, this photo have special meaning, I really hope this photo can be shown in JP. So, ask for all you help, sincerely thank.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Need process help
Collapse
X
-
Hello,
both pictures are not acceptable for Jetphotos, sorry.
The 747 picture is lacking contrast due to overcast conditions, furthermore its heat hazed and obstructed.
The 737 has also contrast issues, it is dark, off centered and cutted off.
Please have a look into our guidelines for the basic requirements for the photos. There are also examples given of what is okay, or not okay.
Click here for the Guidelines
Feel free to contact us again if you have questions for further photos in the future.
Have a good day.Best Regards from Germany,
Julian S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Julian S. View PostHello,
both pictures are not acceptable for Jetphotos, sorry.
The 747 picture is lacking contrast due to overcast conditions, furthermore its heat hazed and obstructed.
The 737 has also contrast issues, it is dark, off centered and cutted off.
Please have a look into our guidelines for the basic requirements for the photos. There are also examples given of what is okay, or not okay.
Click here for the Guidelines
Feel free to contact us again if you have questions for further photos in the future.
Have a good day.
Comment
-
Heat haze is produced by exhaust systems of the aircraft itself, GPU's or similar - or the more common way, by hot air due to the weather. In summer its more likely to have noticeable heat haze in an image as of the high temperatures outside, or because the apron or grass is heated up a lot (what isn't the case in your image) - in your image the heat haze is noticeable around the lettering above the wing, probably due to the start of engines #3 and #4 (right wing). Its not too bad, but noticeable on my screen.
Of course, a picture in cloudy condition can be acceptable - mostly due to an overcast sky, the contrast is very weak and that leads to the rejections of too little contrast (white aircraft in front of a grey or white sky)
But if you know the histogram and if you are choosing your frame well with a background which produces a bit of contrast, i see no reason to reject it.
The most important thing is, wether a rejection for contrast due to bad lighting conditions or a misread histogram, overexposure, softness etc. - try to learn from them, improve your skills, workflow etc. and ask if you have questions. Our Users and JP Crew are always here to give tips.
Have a good evening, stay safe.Best Regards from Germany,
Julian S.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Julian S. View PostHeat haze is produced by exhaust systems of the aircraft itself, GPU's or similar - or the more common way, by hot air due to the weather. In summer its more likely to have noticeable heat haze in an image as of the high temperatures outside, or because the apron or grass is heated up a lot (what isn't the case in your image) - in your image the heat haze is noticeable around the lettering above the wing, probably due to the start of engines #3 and #4 (right wing). Its not too bad, but noticeable on my screen.
Of course, a picture in cloudy condition can be acceptable - mostly due to an overcast sky, the contrast is very weak and that leads to the rejections of too little contrast (white aircraft in front of a grey or white sky)
But if you know the histogram and if you are choosing your frame well with a background which produces a bit of contrast, i see no reason to reject it.
The most important thing is, wether a rejection for contrast due to bad lighting conditions or a misread histogram, overexposure, softness etc. - try to learn from them, improve your skills, workflow etc. and ask if you have questions. Our Users and JP Crew are always here to give tips.
Have a good evening, stay safe.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment