jhud922 - editing advice

[jhud922]

Question about these please!

Copa Airlines - I know this is a wide shot and not cropped on the aircraft, but given its location I want to see if it would be acceptable. There appear to be similar angles in the DB already - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10643233 and https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10567774

JetBlue - would this get by with the tug?

Skyway - asking just because I'm making a post. The aqua cast below it is from the water/beach about to land at SXM.

KLM - I know the crop is not standard, but it could be considered creative and it evens out with the shadow and the guy in the water. Might be able to crop tighter if that would work better. Some similar angles, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10605508, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10378462, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9420139, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9397956

ATR - another wide shot, but plenty of similar shots in the DB - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9541227

Thanks for your time!

[dlowwa]

Question about these please!

Copa Airlines - I know this is a wide shot and not cropped on the aircraft, but given its location I want to see if it would be acceptable. There appear to be similar angles in the DB already - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10643233 and https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10567774

JetBlue - would this get by with the tug?

Skyway - asking just because I'm making a post. The aqua cast below it is from the water/beach about to land at SXM.

KLM - I know the crop is not standard, but it could be considered creative and it evens out with the shadow and the guy in the water. Might be able to crop tighter if that would work better. Some similar angles, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10605508, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10378462, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9420139, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9397956

ATR - another wide shot, but plenty of similar shots in the DB - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9541227

Thanks for your time!

1,5. subjective calls, but I see the first having a much better chance than the last.
2. tug ok
3,4. borderline backlit, but 4 probably ok

[jhud922]

1,5. subjective calls, but I see the first having a much better chance than the last.
2. tug ok
3,4. borderline backlit, but 4 probably ok

thanks for your time Dana have a good weekend!

[jhud922]

I have this rejection for "bad info". As I am still not getting emails from JP, could a screener please tell me what the bad info is? I didn't select a registration as this is an older photo and I can't make it out.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10771094

[dlowwa]

I have this rejection for "bad info". As I am still not getting emails from JP, could a screener please tell me what the bad info is? I didn't select a registration as this is an older photo and I can't make it out.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10771094

Rejected because of missing reg./cn

[jhud922]

Rejected because of missing reg./cn

I'm confused, the upload rules state in section 1.2.4 Registration & Construction numbers (CN) "In case you the registration is unknown leave the field blank."

[dlowwa]

I'm confused, the upload rules state in section 1.2.4 Registration & Construction numbers (CN) "In case you the registration is unknown leave the field blank."

That usually only applies for very old photos (40+ years), or any other image where there is no reasonable way to get the information. An image from a few years ago that is missing the reg. because you didn't catch it at the time would not qualify.

[jhud922]

That usually only applies for very old photos (40+ years), or any other image where there is no reasonable way to get the information. An image from a few years ago that is missing the reg. because you didn't catch it at the time would not qualify.

Perhaps that should be stated in the rules more clearly? The way it is written doesn't mention age at all. Kind of feel like I wasted a lot of time with this one.

[jhud922]

Curious if this has a chance, thanks!

[dlowwa]

Curious if this has a chance, thanks!

A bit of clutter and some compression, but nothing that would be immediately rejectable for me.

[jhud922]

Pre-screening on this please. thanks!

[dlowwa]

Pre-screening on this please. thanks!

Borderline contrast/color.

[jhud922]

Going to ask for an opinion on this one, ive tried other angles unsuccessfully, but I think if taken into account that it is Dusk, hopefully contrast is appropriate etc. Thanks!

+1

[dlowwa]

Going to ask for an opinion on this one, ive tried other angles unsuccessfully, but I think if taken into account that it is Dusk, hopefully contrast is appropriate etc. Thanks!

+1

1. borderline soft/contrast
2. soft/blurry

[jhud922]

Well this got rejected for

• Too much or too little contrast
• Categories wrong or missing

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10990711

Could a screener tell me what category is wrong or missing? I am still not getting the emails so I can't see what the specific problem is.

Also I really think the contrast here is accurate, especially based on the histogram...