Originally posted by dlowwa
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
jhud922 - editing advice
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by jhud922 View Post
I'm confused, the upload rules state in section 1.2.4 Registration & Construction numbers (CN) "In case you the registration is unknown leave the field blank."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jhud922 View PostI have this rejection for "bad info". As I am still not getting emails from JP, could a screener please tell me what the bad info is? I didn't select a registration as this is an older photo and I can't make it out.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10771094
Leave a comment:
-
I have this rejection for "bad info". As I am still not getting emails from JP, could a screener please tell me what the bad info is? I didn't select a registration as this is an older photo and I can't make it out.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10771094
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jhud922 View PostQuestion about these please!
Copa Airlines - I know this is a wide shot and not cropped on the aircraft, but given its location I want to see if it would be acceptable. There appear to be similar angles in the DB already - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10643233 and https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10567774
JetBlue - would this get by with the tug?
Skyway - asking just because I'm making a post. The aqua cast below it is from the water/beach about to land at SXM.
KLM - I know the crop is not standard, but it could be considered creative and it evens out with the shadow and the guy in the water. Might be able to crop tighter if that would work better. Some similar angles, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10605508, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10378462, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9420139, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9397956
ATR - another wide shot, but plenty of similar shots in the DB - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9541227
Thanks for your time!
2. tug ok
3,4. borderline backlit, but 4 probably ok
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Question about these please!
Copa Airlines - I know this is a wide shot and not cropped on the aircraft, but given its location I want to see if it would be acceptable. There appear to be similar angles in the DB already - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10643233 and https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10567774
JetBlue - would this get by with the tug?
Skyway - asking just because I'm making a post. The aqua cast below it is from the water/beach about to land at SXM.
KLM - I know the crop is not standard, but it could be considered creative and it evens out with the shadow and the guy in the water. Might be able to crop tighter if that would work better. Some similar angles, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10605508, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10378462, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9420139, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9397956
ATR - another wide shot, but plenty of similar shots in the DB - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9541227
Thanks for your time!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jhud922 View PostAlso got this rejection for Bad Info (while I was just trying to see how it looked after uploading, but that's on me). As I can't see the rejection emails, could a screener tell me what info was incorrect?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10759214
Leave a comment:
-
Also got this rejection for Bad Info (while I was just trying to see how it looked after uploading, but that's on me). As I can't see the rejection emails, could a screener tell me what info was incorrect?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10759214
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by jhud922 View PostI have this rejection for "heat distortion". https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10669220
Is it worth an appeal? I don't see any noticeable heat haze on the aircraft, so I'm not exactly sure where that is being called out. I could also re-submit at a smaller size that might mitigate it. Just wanted to get a 2nd opinion before I appeal. Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Not a screener, but I see pitting in the top of the fuselage - just been caught out with the same thing that I missed too.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
I have this rejection for "heat distortion". https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10669220
Is it worth an appeal? I don't see any noticeable heat haze on the aircraft, so I'm not exactly sure where that is being called out. I could also re-submit at a smaller size that might mitigate it. Just wanted to get a 2nd opinion before I appeal. Thanks.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: