Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

jhud922 - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jhud922 View Post

    Can you at least help me with the email issue so I can see the rejection comments? Why they aren't visible on the site itself...
    If you ask before appealing, certainly.

    Originally posted by jhud922 View Post
    Am I going to have a problem with the wheels here?
    No, but the contrast, softness, etc., yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhud922
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. no CN was entered
    2. Night Shot. Categories are not auto-selected.
    3. image already appealed. no comment.

    Please do not post requests for advice for images that have already been appealed.
    Can you at least help me with the email issue so I can see the rejection comments? Why they aren't visible on the site itself...

    Am I going to have a problem with the wheels here?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jhud922 View Post
    Could I have a screener provide the detail behind these rejections? I am still not getting emails from JP for some reason so I can't see the comments etc.
    1. no CN was entered
    2. Night Shot. Categories are not auto-selected.
    3. image already appealed. no comment.

    Please do not post requests for advice for images that have already been appealed.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhud922
    replied
    Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post

    When I want to use the tools to check a photo of a new reg, I always just choose a random registration that is already in the database to upload with. You are deleting within hours if not minutes anyways, and with the length of the queue there is no chance of a screener viewing it.
    yeah thats a good idea

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    Originally posted by jhud922 View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10611059 - i got a bad framing for this one. I appealed, but I think it was denied, again I can't really tell. How could the framing be improved? It looks pretty spot on to me even with the centering tool.

    Thanks
    I'm not a screener, but measuring the two distances I've highlighted shows the aircraft a bit too low in the frame - hence the framing.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	procimages-d.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	313.1 KB
ID:	1149453

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    Originally posted by jhud922 View Post

    Ah ok, well that makes more sense then. Can't use the screening tools for new registrations really, got it.
    When I want to use the tools to check a photo of a new reg, I always just choose a random registration that is already in the database to upload with. You are deleting within hours if not minutes anyways, and with the length of the queue there is no chance of a screener viewing it.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhud922
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    New registrations are automatically flagged by the system as hot and go immediately to screening, if that's what you mean. Nobody 'grabs' anything.
    Ah ok, well that makes more sense then. Can't use the screening tools for new registrations really, got it.

    Could I have a screener provide the detail behind these rejections? I am still not getting emails from JP for some reason so I can't see the comments etc.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10646636 - specifically this one has "bad info", I had to manually fill in the details so obviously I did something wrong

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10613737 - this one has wrong category, could I get that detail please? I let it auto select so thats kind of odd.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10611059 - i got a bad framing for this one. I appealed, but I think it was denied, again I can't really tell. How could the framing be improved? It looks pretty spot on to me even with the centering tool.

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jhud922 View Post

    Eh dont worry about it. I guess people auto-grab any new regs or something.
    New registrations are automatically flagged by the system as hot and go immediately to screening, if that's what you mean. Nobody 'grabs' anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhud922
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    To which photo are you referring?
    Eh dont worry about it. I guess people auto-grab any new regs or something.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jhud922 View Post
    Minor quibble here, I uploaded this photo literally only to check out the equalize tool and see how it looked in the other tools, and literally within 1 minute it was locked in screening, and then subsequently rejected, which makes sense, I was trying to delete it out of the queue. I guess you could say don't upload it if you don't intend to submit it, but i mean there is really no other way to pre-screen your own photos than to use the tools on the site. I'm pretty sure that technique is actually suggested by screeners here.

    Also I got a bad info rejection, and i'm curious what that was for? I havn't gotten emails in many months so I can't see the comments.
    To which photo are you referring?

    Leave a comment:


  • jhud922
    replied
    Minor quibble here, I uploaded this photo literally only to check out the equalize tool and see how it looked in the other tools, and literally within 1 minute it was locked in screening, and then subsequently rejected, which makes sense, I was trying to delete it out of the queue. I guess you could say don't upload it if you don't intend to submit it, but i mean there is really no other way to pre-screen your own photos than to use the tools on the site. I'm pretty sure that technique is actually suggested by screeners here.

    Also I got a bad info rejection, and i'm curious what that was for? I havn't gotten emails in many months so I can't see the comments.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhud922
    replied
    is Air Force One considered Civilian or Military for Genre?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jhud922 View Post
    Can I get any screener's thoughts on this? I'd like to start uploading some larger images, but want to verify that the sharpening etc are up to snuff.
    Borderline soft for first; second ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhud922
    replied
    Can I get any screener's thoughts on this? I'd like to start uploading some larger images, but want to verify that the sharpening etc are up to snuff.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • jhud922
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Not sure what you are trying to say.. was this rejected for overprocessed or compression? Either than being very soft and maybe a bit noisy, I don't see an issue with processing/compression.
    An edited version was rejected for being soft (posted above). What I am saying is, the equalize tool is making the background look postarized or compressed, but I just mostly wanted to show that the unedited version looks like that, so naturally a final version will as well. But thanks for your view.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X