If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Could I have a screener provide the detail behind these rejections? I am still not getting emails from JP for some reason so I can't see the comments etc.
1. no CN was entered
2. Night Shot. Categories are not auto-selected.
3. image already appealed. no comment.
Please do not post requests for advice for images that have already been appealed.
When I want to use the tools to check a photo of a new reg, I always just choose a random registration that is already in the database to upload with. You are deleting within hours if not minutes anyways, and with the length of the queue there is no chance of a screener viewing it.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10611059 - i got a bad framing for this one. I appealed, but I think it was denied, again I can't really tell. How could the framing be improved? It looks pretty spot on to me even with the centering tool.
Thanks
I'm not a screener, but measuring the two distances I've highlighted shows the aircraft a bit too low in the frame - hence the framing.
Ah ok, well that makes more sense then. Can't use the screening tools for new registrations really, got it.
When I want to use the tools to check a photo of a new reg, I always just choose a random registration that is already in the database to upload with. You are deleting within hours if not minutes anyways, and with the length of the queue there is no chance of a screener viewing it.
New registrations are automatically flagged by the system as hot and go immediately to screening, if that's what you mean. Nobody 'grabs' anything.
Ah ok, well that makes more sense then. Can't use the screening tools for new registrations really, got it.
Could I have a screener provide the detail behind these rejections? I am still not getting emails from JP for some reason so I can't see the comments etc.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10611059 - i got a bad framing for this one. I appealed, but I think it was denied, again I can't really tell. How could the framing be improved? It looks pretty spot on to me even with the centering tool.
Minor quibble here, I uploaded this photo literally only to check out the equalize tool and see how it looked in the other tools, and literally within 1 minute it was locked in screening, and then subsequently rejected, which makes sense, I was trying to delete it out of the queue. I guess you could say don't upload it if you don't intend to submit it, but i mean there is really no other way to pre-screen your own photos than to use the tools on the site. I'm pretty sure that technique is actually suggested by screeners here.
Also I got a bad info rejection, and i'm curious what that was for? I havn't gotten emails in many months so I can't see the comments.
Minor quibble here, I uploaded this photo literally only to check out the equalize tool and see how it looked in the other tools, and literally within 1 minute it was locked in screening, and then subsequently rejected, which makes sense, I was trying to delete it out of the queue. I guess you could say don't upload it if you don't intend to submit it, but i mean there is really no other way to pre-screen your own photos than to use the tools on the site. I'm pretty sure that technique is actually suggested by screeners here.
Also I got a bad info rejection, and i'm curious what that was for? I havn't gotten emails in many months so I can't see the comments.
Not sure what you are trying to say.. was this rejected for overprocessed or compression? Either than being very soft and maybe a bit noisy, I don't see an issue with processing/compression.
An edited version was rejected for being soft (posted above). What I am saying is, the equalize tool is making the background look postarized or compressed, but I just mostly wanted to show that the unedited version looks like that, so naturally a final version will as well. But thanks for your view.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: