JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice

[JuklicekCZ]

I don't think these photos are night shot

yea, there is indeed still quite a lot of light, but due to the position of the sun the aircraft were already basically flying towards the sun instead of being lit from the side.

[Charlie Chang]

Hello, would these be acceptable?
It was already quite late afternoon, is a night shot needed?
thanks.

I don't think these photos are night shot

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, would these be acceptable?
It was already quite late afternoon, is a night shot needed?
thanks.

[dlowwa]

Thanks, 4. is accepted.
Regarding the MI-24, is it ok otherwise, regardless of the color?
I mean is the slight rotor cut-off and exposure bearable?

I could see someone having an issue with the crop on the right side, but for me it's not a problem.

[JuklicekCZ]

1. colour
2. ok for me
3. cut off, colour
4. ok for me

Thanks, 4. is accepted.
Regarding the MI-24, is it ok otherwise, regardless of the color?
I mean is the slight rotor cut-off and exposure bearable?

[dlowwa]

I recently saw this photo, where the aircraft seem quite very soft.
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10605894
And I don't mean to anyhow complain about the shot, or anything else.
I was just curious whether there are any differences, or not.

Not soft at all. If you find it so, perhaps you might want to adjust your monitor settings.

Hello could this AN124 be accepted?
Hope it would not be considered as back-lit.
Do I have to tick the night shot?

Yes backlit/poor contrast. Not Night Shot.

Also please pre-screening on these.

1. colour
2. ok for me
3. cut off, colour
4. ok for me

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello could this AN124 be accepted?
Hope it would not be considered as back-lit.
Do I have to tick the night shot?

[JuklicekCZ]

Also please pre-screening on these.

[JuklicekCZ]

I recently saw this photo, where the aircraft seem quite very soft.
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10605894
And I don't mean to anyhow complain about the shot, or anything else.
I was just curious whether there are any differences, or not.

[dlowwa]

I would also like to ask you regarding formation photos from airshows.
I wanted to know, whether there are some exceptions being made regarding the strictness in sharpness when screening formation photos.
And if, are the exceptions made for any formation photo or for example if there is more than some specific amount of aircraft?

The latter part of your question is unclear, but there is no difference in quality requirements for formation photos.

[JuklicekCZ]

I would also like to ask you regarding formation photos from airshows.
I wanted to know, whether there are some exceptions being made regarding the strictness in sharpness when screening formation photos.
And if, are the exceptions made for any formation photo or for example if there is more than some specific amount of aircraft?

[JuklicekCZ]

Thanks

[dlowwa]

Ok and what about the default with a slightly decreased exposure?

Contrast/exposure ok for me.

[JuklicekCZ]

Not a bad idea generally, but I specifically said it was too strong several times.



Better, but still might be a bit harsh.

Ok and what about the default with a slightly decreased exposure?

[dlowwa]

I just kept sticking to a general advice saying too much/ too little contrast almost always means too little

Not a bad idea generally, but I specifically said it was too strong several times.

Could this hopefully be a final edit?
I think that at his photo I got rid of most of the black and highlight clipping.

Better, but still might be a bit harsh.