JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, I have received this rejection for being soft.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10450749
Would this other shot be acceptable?
Also, there are two poles in the background, but one of them is apparently leaning.
Is the level alright this ways?

[dlowwa]

Hello, I have received this rejection for being soft.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10450749
Would this other shot be acceptable?
Also, there are two poles in the background, but one of them is apparently leaning.
Is the level alright this ways?

Acceptable for me.

[JuklicekCZ]

Acceptable for me.

Thanks, accepted.
Also, I have had this rejection for contrast.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10412492
Is this updated version acceptable, or is it still too much?

[dlowwa]

Thanks, accepted.
Also, I have had this rejection for contrast.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10412492
Is this updated version acceptable, or is it still too much?

Lack of contrast on the original, so this one is slightly worse.

[JuklicekCZ]

Thanks, and this one?

[dlowwa]

Thanks, and this one?

Not much difference from the rejected.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, would these shots have any chance to be accepted?
Thanks.

[dlowwa]

Hello, would these shots have any chance to be accepted?
Thanks.

1. soft
2. borderline soft/centering
3. soft, noisy, contrast
4-5. borderline contrast (ok for me)

[JuklicekCZ]

For 4 and 5, borderline too little?

[dlowwa]

For 4 and 5, borderline too little?

Borderline due to overcast conditions.

[JuklicekCZ]

Thanks, would this one be better?
It is a subseuent shot.

[dlowwa]

Thanks, would this one be better?
It is a subseuent shot.

Don't see much difference.

[JuklicekCZ]

Thanks and what about these?
Here the CASA is lit much more.

[dlowwa]

Thanks and what about these?
Here the CASA is lit much more.

1. contrast, borderline soft
2. soft, borderline noisy
3. borderline contrast/soft

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, please don't take this offensively, I would just like to discuss a rejection.
I have received this rejection for being soft.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10504065
To be honest this photo was rejected twice, first was rejected for missing C/N even-though, C/N is optional parameter, but ok, however it did not anyhow mention sharpness.
So I accepted the C/N problem and uploaded it again with the C/N but it got rejected because of being soft.
Thus I wanted to ask, whether the soft rejection is correct as to me it did not seem too soft to be an issue also with respect to the fact, that it is a first registration and the first rejection did not mention it.
If it is a problem would it be acceptable in a lower resolution?