Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

    Understood, thanks.
    And what about theese?
    not screener
    1:dark, soft
    2:soft
    Kind regards from Shanghai
    Charlie Chang

    Comment


    • Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

      Understood, thanks.
      And what about theese?
      I also am a bit puzzled about the following one, It seems to me either bit dart, or harsh.
      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10511174
      Are my assumptions correct, or is the contrast acceptable?
      1. dark/contrast, soft, noisy
      2. soft, horizon

      Comment


      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

        1. dark/contrast, soft, noisy
        2. soft, horizon
        Thanks and the zenair in the link?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

          Thanks and the zenair in the link?
          I would say bit harsh contrast, could close the shadows and highlights inward a bit.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

            Thanks and the zenair in the link?
            Not sure your question. Was it rejected? Already in the queue? There is easily avoidable obstruction on the main gear.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

              Not sure your question. Was it rejected? Already in the queue? There is easily avoidable obstruction on the main gear.
              It was not rejected, I did have it in the queue, but then I started to somewhat feel unsure about the contrast, so I dequeued it and asked for an opinion.
              I did not even notice the straw of a grass, could it really be an issue?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
                I did not even notice the straw of a grass, could it really be an issue?
                If it was easy to avoid, yes.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  If it was easy to avoid, yes.
                  Ok, thanks, I'll use another shot.

                  Comment


                  • Hello, would these two Gripens be acceptable?
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
                      Hello, would these two Gripens be acceptable?
                      Some softness issues on the first, and contrast a bit washed out/overprocessed. Borderline for both.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                        Some softness issues on the first, and contrast a bit washed out/overprocessed. Borderline for both.
                        OK, I'll try to work with the contrast a bit.
                        Does the Contrast/overprocessed apply on both or only on the second?
                        However may I ask you, based on what did you measure the over processing?
                        I don't see any halos, nor banding in the sky.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

                          OK, I'll try to work with the contrast a bit.
                          Does the Contrast/overprocessed apply on both or only on the second?
                          However may I ask you, based on what did you measure the over processing?
                          I don't see any halos, nor banding in the sky.
                          Shadows and highlights are very weak considering the strength of the light. This is typical when shadow/highlight-type tools are used.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                            Shadows and highlights are very weak considering the strength of the light. This is typical when shadow/highlight-type tools are used.
                            For the second, one, it was actually quite overcast, so maybe, that may be a cause for the contrast either.
                            But on the 1st one, the contrast should be fine, right?

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

                              For the second, one, it was actually quite overcast, so maybe, that may be a cause for the contrast either.
                              But on the 1st one, the contrast should be fine, right?
                              Yes.

                              Comment


                              • Hello,
                                Im a bit confused about this rejection, it says overexposed.
                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10581960
                                Hoever from my perspective, the histogram does not seem to be overexposed, and the only part that could be considered on the brighter side is the area between the cockpit and the wing.
                                However that is just because it is a white aircraft and it is the most affected part by the light.
                                But frommy perspective the overall picture seems to me more towards the darker side.
                                There wasn't even any clipping indicated by the lightroom.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X