Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
2. soft, horizon
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Not sure your question. Was it rejected? Already in the queue? There is easily avoidable obstruction on the main gear.
I did not even notice the straw of a grass, could it really be an issue?
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Some softness issues on the first, and contrast a bit washed out/overprocessed. Borderline for both.
Does the Contrast/overprocessed apply on both or only on the second?
However may I ask you, based on what did you measure the over processing?
I don't see any halos, nor banding in the sky.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
OK, I'll try to work with the contrast a bit.
Does the Contrast/overprocessed apply on both or only on the second?
However may I ask you, based on what did you measure the over processing?
I don't see any halos, nor banding in the sky.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Shadows and highlights are very weak considering the strength of the light. This is typical when shadow/highlight-type tools are used.
But on the 1st one, the contrast should be fine, right?
Comment
-
Hello,
Im a bit confused about this rejection, it says overexposed.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Hoever from my perspective, the histogram does not seem to be overexposed, and the only part that could be considered on the brighter side is the area between the cockpit and the wing.
However that is just because it is a white aircraft and it is the most affected part by the light.
But frommy perspective the overall picture seems to me more towards the darker side.
There wasn't even any clipping indicated by the lightroom.
Comment
Comment