JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice

[Alex - Spot-This !]

from the same day yes - From the same PHASE no (take-off / landing / taxying / parked ac)

Regards
Alex

[JuklicekCZ]

They are not technically similar but I would personally only upload 1, the one which is already accepted.

Regards
Alex

So is it technically possible to have more than a single shot of one aircraft from the same day/sequence in case that the angle and background are different enough?
I thought that the UG forbids that.
I ofc am not planning to abuse it, I'm just curios about that.

[Alex - Spot-This !]

They are not technically similar but I would personally only upload 1, the one which is already accepted.

Regards
Alex

[JuklicekCZ]

I can suggest an appeal there.

Thank you Alex!
Btw, I already have another shot of this glider accepted and that I like much more.
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10747111
Can the appeal be done even in that case? Or can the rejection be at least somewhat withdrawn?

[Alex - Spot-This !]

I can suggest an appeal there.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello,
Im a bit confused about this rejection, it says overexposed.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10581960
Hoever from my perspective, the histogram does not seem to be overexposed, and the only part that could be considered on the brighter side is the area between the cockpit and the wing.
However that is just because it is a white aircraft and it is the most affected part by the light.
But frommy perspective the overall picture seems to me more towards the darker side.
There wasn't even any clipping indicated by the lightroom.

[dlowwa]

For the second, one, it was actually quite overcast, so maybe, that may be a cause for the contrast either.
But on the 1st one, the contrast should be fine, right?

Yes.

[JuklicekCZ]

Shadows and highlights are very weak considering the strength of the light. This is typical when shadow/highlight-type tools are used.

For the second, one, it was actually quite overcast, so maybe, that may be a cause for the contrast either.
But on the 1st one, the contrast should be fine, right?

[dlowwa]

OK, I'll try to work with the contrast a bit.
Does the Contrast/overprocessed apply on both or only on the second?
However may I ask you, based on what did you measure the over processing?
I don't see any halos, nor banding in the sky.

Shadows and highlights are very weak considering the strength of the light. This is typical when shadow/highlight-type tools are used.

[JuklicekCZ]

Some softness issues on the first, and contrast a bit washed out/overprocessed. Borderline for both.

OK, I'll try to work with the contrast a bit.
Does the Contrast/overprocessed apply on both or only on the second?
However may I ask you, based on what did you measure the over processing?
I don't see any halos, nor banding in the sky.

[dlowwa]

Hello, would these two Gripens be acceptable?

Some softness issues on the first, and contrast a bit washed out/overprocessed. Borderline for both.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, would these two Gripens be acceptable?

[JuklicekCZ]

If it was easy to avoid, yes.

Ok, thanks, I'll use another shot.

[dlowwa]

I did not even notice the straw of a grass, could it really be an issue?

If it was easy to avoid, yes.

[JuklicekCZ]

Not sure your question. Was it rejected? Already in the queue? There is easily avoidable obstruction on the main gear.

It was not rejected, I did have it in the queue, but then I started to somewhat feel unsure about the contrast, so I dequeued it and asked for an opinion.
I did not even notice the straw of a grass, could it really be an issue?