JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice

[JuklicekCZ]

Thanks, and this one?

[dlowwa]

Thanks, accepted.
Also, I have had this rejection for contrast.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10412492

Is this updated version acceptable, or is it still too much?

Lack of contrast on the original, so this one is slightly worse.

[JuklicekCZ]

Acceptable for me.

Thanks, accepted.
Also, I have had this rejection for contrast.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10412492

Is this updated version acceptable, or is it still too much?

[dlowwa]

Hello, I have received this rejection for being soft.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10450749

Would this other shot be acceptable?
Also, there are two poles in the background, but one of them is apparently leaning.
Is the level alright this ways?

Acceptable for me.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, I have received this rejection for being soft.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10450749

Would this other shot be acceptable?
Also, there are two poles in the background, but one of them is apparently leaning.
Is the level alright this ways?

[JuklicekCZ]

Better. I still don't think the quality is there, but might have a 50% chance now.

Thanks, it got accepted though.

[dlowwa]

Thanks, and wwhat about this one?

Looks soft/blurry and oversharpened to compensate. Also noisy and borderline contrast.

[JuklicekCZ]

1. dark, borderline soft
2. dark, contrast
3. soft, borderline contrast

Thanks, and wwhat about this one?

[dlowwa]

Hello, would these be acceptable?

1. dark, borderline soft
2. dark, contrast
3. soft, borderline contrast

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, would these be acceptable?

[dlowwa]

Hello, would these be acceptable?
Also I believe, that the L-29 should be marked as warbird, is that correct?

1. borderline soft/noisy
2. horizon, contrast, noisy

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/aviation-photography-videography-forums/aviation-photography-forum/60422-upload-guidelines-new-version?58983-UPLOAD-GUIDELINES-New-version=

2.2 Categories

Warbird / Vintage
This category is to be selected for old planes (anything that was not built after 1970, or where the production started before 1970), planes that are no longer in regular service and planes in museums. Also, replicas of vintage aircraft need the "vintage" category.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, would these be acceptable?
Also I believe, that the L-29 should be marked as warbird, is that correct?

[dlowwa]

I have re-visited the bulls formation and added more contrast, and it seems much better to me.
Question is, isn't it too hash now?

Better. I still don't think the quality is there, but might have a 50% chance now.

[JuklicekCZ]

I have re-visited the bulls formation and added more contrast, and it seems much better to me.
Question is, isn't it too hash now?

[JuklicekCZ]

Looks a bit yellow to me, but otherwise fine.

Thanks a lot, yes, my camera does tend to shoot a little bit towards the warm colors and I forgot to cool the shot down
I'll fix it before uploading.