Originally posted by JuklicekCZ
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice
Collapse
X
-
-
Hello,
May I ask regarding this rejection?
Is it the contrast too low?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=10894477
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Might need a little CW rotation.
And the 1st one, would it be acceptable? (I mean just from the technical point of view regarding the crop excluding all other aspects.)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
These are similar.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View PostHello, I have never tried submitting a close-up crop, so I would like to get an opinion.
Would it be acceptable to submit such a crop including the whole engine with just the root of the wing or shall I rather exclude the engine completely making the crop between the W and I characters of the airline name?
Also, If I had uploaded the 2nd with it, would the angle and motive be considered different enough, to have both accepted even-though, the day and phase are the same?
Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello, I have never tried submitting a close-up crop, so I would like to get an opinion.
Would it be acceptable to submit such a crop including the whole engine with just the root of the wing or shall I rather exclude the engine completely making the crop between the W and I characters of the airline name?
Also, If I had uploaded the 2nd with it, would the angle and motive be considered different enough, to have both accepted even-though, the day and phase are the same?
Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View PostHello,
I was just wondering, whether this shot would have any chance.
OFC I'm aware of the potential contrast issue in case of overcast weather, on the other hand, there are plenty of shots under heavy rain and similar stuff.
So I wanted to ask, whether a shot like that can be accepted.
Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello,
I was just wondering, whether this shot would have any chance.
OFC I'm aware of the potential contrast issue in case of overcast weather, on the other hand, there are plenty of shots under heavy rain and similar stuff.
So I wanted to ask, whether a shot like that can be accepted.
Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Bit of glare there, but would be ok for me.
Not at all soft for me.
It seems that the rejection might likely have been a mistake, appeal was successful.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View PostHello, I'm not sure about this shot.
The aircraft is very silver and under a direct light causing the fuselage to be very bright.
Could this end up as a glare rejection, or would it be ok?
Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View PostAlso, may I ask, based on what measurement is the following shot considered soft?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10621907
To me the border around the A/C seemed sharp enough so just wanted to know what else should I look for in the future.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello, I'm not sure about this shot.
The aircraft is very silver and under a direct light causing the fuselage to be very bright.
Could this end up as a glare rejection, or would it be ok?
Also, may I ask, based on what measurement is the following shot considered soft?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10621907
To me the border around the A/C seemed sharp enough so just wanted to know what else should I look for in the future.
Leave a comment:
-
Agree with Mark.
Unfortunately faced this issue myself on some occasions as well.
Even when there is a very tiny bit of the aircraft cut off, you will get rejected for that.
A very tiny tip of the tail edge is indeed missing.
Regards.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
While I am not a screener, I think the rejection is valid - it does appear (correct or not) that the tip edge does seem to be cut off - I think a framing rejection would have applied probably as well, but purely on looks, it does seem cut-off. Just my opinion.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: