JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice

[dlowwa]

Hello,
May I ask regarding this rejection?
Is it the contrast too low?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=10894477

Contrast ok for me, but looks a little dark. Increase the exposure and add a little contrast and it should be fine.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello,
May I ask regarding this rejection?
Is it the contrast too low?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=10894477

[JuklicekCZ]

Might need a little CW rotation.

thanks, except for the level no other issues?
And the 1st one, would it be acceptable? (I mean just from the technical point of view regarding the crop excluding all other aspects.)

[dlowwa]

Ok, thanks, and what about just the 2nd?

Might need a little CW rotation.

[JuklicekCZ]

These are similar.

Ok, thanks, and what about just the 2nd?

[dlowwa]

Hello, I have never tried submitting a close-up crop, so I would like to get an opinion.
Would it be acceptable to submit such a crop including the whole engine with just the root of the wing or shall I rather exclude the engine completely making the crop between the W and I characters of the airline name?
Also, If I had uploaded the 2nd with it, would the angle and motive be considered different enough, to have both accepted even-though, the day and phase are the same?
Thanks.

These are similar.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, I have never tried submitting a close-up crop, so I would like to get an opinion.
Would it be acceptable to submit such a crop including the whole engine with just the root of the wing or shall I rather exclude the engine completely making the crop between the W and I characters of the airline name?
Also, If I had uploaded the 2nd with it, would the angle and motive be considered different enough, to have both accepted even-though, the day and phase are the same?
Thanks.

[dlowwa]

Hello,
I was just wondering, whether this shot would have any chance.
OFC I'm aware of the potential contrast issue in case of overcast weather, on the other hand, there are plenty of shots under heavy rain and similar stuff.
So I wanted to ask, whether a shot like that can be accepted.
Thanks.

Very likely a rejection for contrast and possibly soft.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello,
I was just wondering, whether this shot would have any chance.
OFC I'm aware of the potential contrast issue in case of overcast weather, on the other hand, there are plenty of shots under heavy rain and similar stuff.
So I wanted to ask, whether a shot like that can be accepted.
Thanks.

[JuklicekCZ]

Bit of glare there, but would be ok for me.



Not at all soft for me.

Thank you very much.
It seems that the rejection might likely have been a mistake, appeal was successful.

[dlowwa]

Hello, I'm not sure about this shot.
The aircraft is very silver and under a direct light causing the fuselage to be very bright.
Could this end up as a glare rejection, or would it be ok?

Bit of glare there, but would be ok for me.

Also, may I ask, based on what measurement is the following shot considered soft?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10621907
To me the border around the A/C seemed sharp enough so just wanted to know what else should I look for in the future.

Not at all soft for me.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, I'm not sure about this shot.

The aircraft is very silver and under a direct light causing the fuselage to be very bright.
Could this end up as a glare rejection, or would it be ok?
Also, may I ask, based on what measurement is the following shot considered soft?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10621907
To me the border around the A/C seemed sharp enough so just wanted to know what else should I look for in the future.

[JuklicekCZ]

Thanks guys

[wkd001]

Agree with Mark.
Unfortunately faced this issue myself on some occasions as well.
Even when there is a very tiny bit of the aircraft cut off, you will get rejected for that.
A very tiny tip of the tail edge is indeed missing.

Regards.

[MarkLawrence]

While I am not a screener, I think the rejection is valid - it does appear (correct or not) that the tip edge does seem to be cut off - I think a framing rejection would have applied probably as well, but purely on looks, it does seem cut-off. Just my opinion.