Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Hello,
    May I ask regarding this rejection?
    Is it the contrast too low?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=10894477
    Contrast ok for me, but looks a little dark. Increase the exposure and add a little contrast and it should be fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Hello,
    May I ask regarding this rejection?
    Is it the contrast too low?

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Might need a little CW rotation.
    thanks, except for the level no other issues?
    And the 1st one, would it be acceptable? (I mean just from the technical point of view regarding the crop excluding all other aspects.)

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

    Ok, thanks, and what about just the 2nd?
    Might need a little CW rotation.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    These are similar.
    Ok, thanks, and what about just the 2nd?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Hello, I have never tried submitting a close-up crop, so I would like to get an opinion.
    Would it be acceptable to submit such a crop including the whole engine with just the root of the wing or shall I rather exclude the engine completely making the crop between the W and I characters of the airline name?
    Also, If I had uploaded the 2nd with it, would the angle and motive be considered different enough, to have both accepted even-though, the day and phase are the same?
    Thanks.
    These are similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Hello, I have never tried submitting a close-up crop, so I would like to get an opinion.
    Would it be acceptable to submit such a crop including the whole engine with just the root of the wing or shall I rather exclude the engine completely making the crop between the W and I characters of the airline name?
    Also, If I had uploaded the 2nd with it, would the angle and motive be considered different enough, to have both accepted even-though, the day and phase are the same?
    Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Hello,
    I was just wondering, whether this shot would have any chance.
    OFC I'm aware of the potential contrast issue in case of overcast weather, on the other hand, there are plenty of shots under heavy rain and similar stuff.
    So I wanted to ask, whether a shot like that can be accepted.
    Thanks.
    Very likely a rejection for contrast and possibly soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Hello,
    I was just wondering, whether this shot would have any chance.
    OFC I'm aware of the potential contrast issue in case of overcast weather, on the other hand, there are plenty of shots under heavy rain and similar stuff.
    So I wanted to ask, whether a shot like that can be accepted.
    Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Bit of glare there, but would be ok for me.



    Not at all soft for me.
    Thank you very much.
    It seems that the rejection might likely have been a mistake, appeal was successful.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Hello, I'm not sure about this shot.
    The aircraft is very silver and under a direct light causing the fuselage to be very bright.
    Could this end up as a glare rejection, or would it be ok?
    Bit of glare there, but would be ok for me.

    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Also, may I ask, based on what measurement is the following shot considered soft?
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    To me the border around the A/C seemed sharp enough so just wanted to know what else should I look for in the future.
    Not at all soft for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Hello, I'm not sure about this shot.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_51415.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	365.9 KB
ID:	1149618
    The aircraft is very silver and under a direct light causing the fuselage to be very bright.
    Could this end up as a glare rejection, or would it be ok?
    Also, may I ask, based on what measurement is the following shot considered soft?
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    To me the border around the A/C seemed sharp enough so just wanted to know what else should I look for in the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Thanks guys

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Agree with Mark.
    Unfortunately faced this issue myself on some occasions as well.
    Even when there is a very tiny bit of the aircraft cut off, you will get rejected for that.
    A very tiny tip of the tail edge is indeed missing.

    Regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    While I am not a screener, I think the rejection is valid - it does appear (correct or not) that the tip edge does seem to be cut off - I think a framing rejection would have applied probably as well, but purely on looks, it does seem cut-off. Just my opinion.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X