If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I had one of this Aer Lingus in the queue for a while and kept getting uneasy that it was too dark so I deleted it. I increased the exposure on it to upload here.
Also another night shot and hot photo. I'm assuming the flapping red flag off the wingtip wouldn't lead to a rejection for blur or something, but I hate losing slots.
Edit: And this night shot from a couple comments back was just rejected for Dark and Undersharpened. Maybe it was undersharpened, but the aircraft is well lit so I'm not sure how it's supposed to look to make it not 'dark'. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10587117
1. soft, overprocessed (too much NR), borderline dark
2. ok for me
1. soft, overprocessed (too much NR), borderline dark
2. ok for me
Rejected image does indeed need brightening.
Do you think it's a similar story on this Finnair as the Lingus?
That biz jet night shot was rejected also https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10588939. Massive difference of opinion on those between you and whoever screened it, I guess . Oh well. Maybe I'll just move past those.
That biz jet night shot was rejected also https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10588939. Massive difference of opinion on those between you and whoever screened it, I guess . Oh well. Maybe I'll just move past those.
Sharpening and processing are fine. I can maybe see the horizon being off a bit, but otherwise I would have suggested an appeal.
Maybe the bad processing could actually be caused by applying too much noise reduction, but its just a guess.
That's what I had assumed, but when I checked on it, I really didn't apply 'that much' (which is obviously subjective, but it was a lot less than I had thought I must've applied). Plus Dana said processing was fine, so I dunno. I don't feel like I see a bunch of lost detail or anything. Just the nature of the game.
This rejection I am unsure about. I can't see anything that would make me believe it needs rotation one way or another. I don't really see soft spots on it but I'm more willing to concede that rejection reason.
This rejection I am unsure about. I can't see anything that would make me believe it needs rotation one way or another. I don't really see soft spots on it but I'm more willing to concede that rejection reason.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment