Advice/Confirmation requested by jakerepp

[jakerepp]

Trying different things out, is this crop okay? And the second one, I'm 99% sure the quality isn't there, but I didn't realize what I got in the background so I figured I'd try to edit it somehow.

[dlowwa]

Do these look okay?

Don't see any major issues.

[jakerepp]

Do these look okay?

[dlowwa]

Horizon rejection that is disagree with. The light pole is leaning but building verticals look perfect to me. I've taken enough photos are SDL now to know a lot of the light poles there are askew. Screener comment did say clockwise needed, but I don't think that applies if using the building as a guide.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11345729

Looks like it needs CW rotation to me.

[jakerepp]

Horizon rejection that is disagree with. The light pole is leaning but building verticals look perfect to me. I've taken enough photos are SDL now to know a lot of the light poles there are askew. Screener comment did say clockwise needed, but I don't think that applies if using the building as a guide.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11345729

[jakerepp]

Does this look okay? Can't tell if there is vignetting in the top of the frame.

[jakerepp]

1. dark/contrast, borderline soft
2. dark/contrast

angle of the light/sun - nose bright, rest of aircraft darker

3. ok for me

Make sense. No setting will fix that then, I suppose.

[dlowwa]

These 737's both look underexposed to me, but I'm not sure what setting would've caused it. I always shoot aperture priority and had exposure comp at neutral. Is it just the angle of the sun and the vast background? Not sure if there's a better white balance or some other setting for these conditions. Do you have an opinion on either the quality or the settings?

Also, does the Sr22 look okay?

1. dark/contrast, borderline soft
2. dark/contrast

angle of the light/sun - nose bright, rest of aircraft darker

3. ok for me

[jakerepp]

These 737's both look underexposed to me, but I'm not sure what setting would've caused it. I always shoot aperture priority and had exposure comp at neutral. Is it just the angle of the sun and the vast background? Not sure if there's a better white balance or some other setting for these conditions. Do you have an opinion on either the quality or the settings?

Also, does the Sr22 look okay?

[jakerepp]

Screener(s) indicated a little CW rotation was needed.

Oh, well that's another question then. I'm not seeing the notes in emails now.

[dlowwa]

Can you help me out with this one? The horizon looks fine to me
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11114344

Screener(s) indicated a little CW rotation was needed.

[jakerepp]

Can you help me out with this one? The horizon looks fine to me

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11114344

[dlowwa]

Does this one work? Chinooks look odd when centering using the main fuselage so I centered more using the gear and the rotor mounts.

I'd crop a bit tighter, but yeah almost works.

[jakerepp]

Awkward crop. If you're going to crop the rotors, crop tighter to the body like on the accepted image.

Does this one work? Chinooks look odd when centering using the main fuselage so I centered more using the gear and the rotor mounts.

[jakerepp]

Awkward crop. If you're going to crop the rotors, crop tighter to the body like on the accepted image.

I sort of came to that conclusion, just wasn't sure why the rejection reason was cut off and not crop, but it makes sense.