Advice/Confirmation requested by jakerepp

[dlowwa]

Okay, thanks. I guess I can see that.

Do you think this one is okay? It's a new reg but I didn't upload it initially cause I wasn't sure about the contrast and the angle working.

Might need a tiny bit of CW rotation, and some heat haze visible.

[jakerepp]

Might need a tiny bit of CW rotation, and some heat haze visible.

Yeah the horizon is tricky. I thought the building verticals looked okay but the plane isn't level. Didn't catch the heat haze. I'll probably just scrap it.

[jakerepp]

I have a question about this photo and whether or not it is Hot.

It's registration is N6067E which is an experimental registration for Boeing, whatever that means. The aircraft will be registered ET-AZO. There is a 'Experimental' designation just rear of the forward cabin door. There are photos of this registration but none of this aircraft wearing it.

I just don't know if it counts as a livery change or how to mark it as hot.

NEVERMIND! I realized the criteria for hot photos does count for this type of situation. You can ignore this and I'll delete the photo from the post.

[jakerepp]

Some boneyard shots for pre-screening. I think the old Aer Lingus is possibly obstructed.

[dlowwa]

Some boneyard shots for pre-screening. I think the old Aer Lingus is possibly obstructed.

Both a bit dark.

[jakerepp]

Both a bit dark.

A little better here? Nothing else that stands out?

[dlowwa]

A little better here? Nothing else that stands out?

Maybe a bit soft, but otherwise ok for me.

[jakerepp]

Prescreening please. I think I had to crop too much and it's lacking in quality now.

Also, this rejection confuses me. I don't know how it isn't centered. The other rejection reasons make sense to me, but the composition I'm baffled by.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10667142

[dlowwa]

Prescreening please. I think I had to crop too much and it's lacking in quality now.

Also, this rejection confuses me. I don't know how it isn't centered. The other rejection reasons make sense to me, but the composition I'm baffled by.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10667142

Centering looks fine, I suspect it was meant to be a horizon rejection (needs a touch of CW).

New image is a bit soft (probably b/c heat haze).

[jakerepp]

Centering looks fine, I suspect it was meant to be a horizon rejection (needs a touch of CW).

New image is a bit soft (probably b/c heat haze).

I see that now. Definitely makes more sense than centering. Thanks!

[jakerepp]

Centering looks fine, I suspect it was meant to be a horizon rejection (needs a touch of CW).

New image is a bit soft (probably b/c heat haze).

Does this look okay now?

[jakerepp]

And could you also pre-screen these hot photos?

[dlowwa]

And could you also pre-screen these hot photos?

1. borderline soft/clutter
2-3. ok for me

[jakerepp]

1. borderline soft/clutter
2-3. ok for me

Wasn't sure if the clutter would lead to a rejection. How's this one instead?

Nevermind, it was accepted.

[jakerepp]

Could you pre-screen these? I think the crop on the helo looks okay but not positive. Also what would the category be for the runway shot? Just 'Runway'? Never uploaded an airport shot and no open queue slots so I can't see the available categories.