Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Advice/Confirmation requested by jakerepp
Collapse
X
-
Debated whether or not to ask if you agree with this rejection, but you sided with me recently so I figured I'd ask again. I thought the light looked quite nice, but do you think the lighting is okay?
Comment
-
Originally posted by jakerepp View PostDebated whether or not to ask if you agree with this rejection, but you sided with me recently so I figured I'd ask again. I thought the light looked quite nice, but do you think the lighting is okay?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10997354
Comment
-
I can't tell if this is backlit or not...the tail looks darker than most of the orange that is obviously getting good light to it, but there's also a shadow from a wick on the tail so I guess it isn't technically backlit, but rather toplit so the tail is barely getting light? I dunno.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jakerepp View PostI can't tell if this is backlit or not...the tail looks darker than most of the orange that is obviously getting good light to it, but there's also a shadow from a wick on the tail so I guess it isn't technically backlit, but rather toplit so the tail is barely getting light? I dunno.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Do these look okay? Can't tell if the SR20 is blurry/soft.
Also, unsure if the United would be a hot photo or regular queue. The other photo of it is my photo but the plane had Hainan Airlines winglets still. They've been painted in United colors now, but not sure it warrants hot status.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jakerepp View PostDo these look okay? Can't tell if the SR20 is blurry/soft.
Also, unsure if the United would be a hot photo or regular queue. The other photo of it is my photo but the plane had Hainan Airlines winglets still. They've been painted in United colors now, but not sure it warrants hot status.
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10833480
If hot or not is a bit of a gray area; would be based on whether the pervious (Hainan) scheme was considered temporary or not. If yes, then not hot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
All ok for me in terms of quality, though don't find the crop/angle on the last particularly appealing (personal opinion).
If hot or not is a bit of a gray area; would be based on whether the pervious (Hainan) scheme was considered temporary or not. If yes, then not hot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
It was not taken up by Hainan, so I assume it wasn't 'temporary' per se, since it was supposed to go to them and had been painted as such at one point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Another way of looking at it is that it was only temporarily in Hainan's colors before changing to its 'permanent' United scheme. Upload at your own risk
Comment
-
I'm seeing vignetting under equalization on this hot photo. Would it be rejected for vignetting (or any other reason)? I have a tighter crop, cutting off the left wing quite a lot and taking the horizontal stabilizer to the edge of the frame that at least hides the vignetting on the right side of the frame.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jakerepp View PostI'm seeing vignetting under equalization on this hot photo. Would it be rejected for vignetting (or any other reason)? I have a tighter crop, cutting off the left wing quite a lot and taking the horizontal stabilizer to the edge of the frame that at least hides the vignetting on the right side of the frame.
Comment
Comment