Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Advice/Confirmation requested by jakerepp

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jakerepp
    replied
    This rejection caught me off guard a bit. I realize it's a dark airplane but I really thought it was properly exposed. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12309119

    Also, PS for these all well, mostly regarding sharpening.Click image for larger version

Name:	N200DR.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	389.8 KB
ID:	1205063
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Is this too soft? (new reg)
    Ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N28UH-3.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	611.0 KB
ID:	1203647Is this too soft? (new reg)

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    My last two appeals have been accepted so I'm gonna ask about this one as well
    I think the aircraft itself is not too bad, but the paint job on the tail makes it look really soft.​

    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Pre-screen on these please.
    Maybe a touch soft, but ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Pre-screen on these please.Click image for larger version  Name:	n7305s.jpg Views:	0 Size:	580.0 KB ID:	1203350
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    My last two appeals have been accepted so I'm gonna ask about this one as well

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    One of those damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't..level the runway, buildings will be off, level the buildings, runway will be off. Generally we prefer the verticals be straight, which they appear to be here. I would accept this on appeal, but couldn't promise the same for others.
    It was accepted. Thanks, Dana

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    One of those damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't..level the runway, buildings will be off, level the buildings, runway will be off. Generally we prefer the verticals be straight, which they appear to be here. I would accept this on appeal, but couldn't promise the same for others.
    Its a really tricky spotting location. A screener commented on another of mine just like this, saying they know its a tough call but it looked slightly off and upon further inspection I agreed, but this one looks good to me.

    I'll give it a shot I suppose.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    I get horizon rejections with some regularity at Scottsdale. Most of the time I disagree because I just can't see how it could be more than .1 degree off. This is one of those. The runway has some very significant slope to it at this end which is extremely obvious in some of my accepted photos like this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11482702 and this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11442972

    I don't see which direction it would need to go. Looking at the horizon gridlines, in some spots it looks perfect and in other spots it looks the tiniest bit off. The motion blur makes it even more difficult to tell for sure. I honestly assumed this was rejected for soft, so I'm wondering if its worth appealing. I feel like sometimes screeners might reject too quickly based only on the slope of the runway.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=12194806
    One of those damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't..level the runway, buildings will be off, level the buildings, runway will be off. Generally we prefer the verticals be straight, which they appear to be here. I would accept this on appeal, but couldn't promise the same for others.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    I get horizon rejections with some regularity at Scottsdale. Most of the time I disagree because I just can't see how it could be more than .1 degree off. This is one of those. The runway has some very significant slope to it at this end which is extremely obvious in some of my accepted photos like this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11482702 and this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11442972

    I don't see which direction it would need to go. Looking at the horizon gridlines, in some spots it looks perfect and in other spots it looks the tiniest bit off. The motion blur makes it even more difficult to tell for sure. I honestly assumed this was rejected for soft, so I'm wondering if its worth appealing. I feel like sometimes screeners might reject too quickly based only on the slope of the runway.



    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Any closer?
    A bit dark, but would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Any closer?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N87CB-3.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	375.7 KB
ID:	1201088

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Are these okay? 2 of them obviously seem at least a bit dark...
    1. borderline dark/soft
    2-4. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Are these okay? 2 of them obviously seem at least a bit dark...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N87CB.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	448.2 KB
ID:	1200839
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yeah, it's ok for me.
    Thanks, appealed and it was accepted.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X