Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Advice/Confirmation requested by jakerepp

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jakerepp
    replied
    Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post

    so, what is the attached file?
    Thought I removed it. Hit CTRL-V, thinking I had copied a link but there was still a work-related screenshot on my clipboard

    Leave a comment:


  • TRTPUwU
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Does this rejection seem right? I was honestly afraid it might be oversharpened in spots. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11657043
    so, what is the attached file?

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Does this rejection seem right? I was honestly afraid it might be oversharpened in spots. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11657043

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Pre-screening please. A different shot of the Tecnam was rejected for blurry but I think this frame is okay. All hot, if it makes a difference
    All a bit soft, but probably fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Pre-screening please. A different shot of the Tecnam was rejected for blurry but I think this frame is okay. All hot, if it makes a difference
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Better?
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Better?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Is this one okay? Feel like it's a bit soft. It was a fairly heavy crop
    Noisy & poor dust removal.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Is this one okay? Feel like it's a bit soft. It was a fairly heavy crop
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    This has been rejected for soft at 1400, but this is 1280, but wondering if there's some blur in the tail area. The text on the tail almost looks blurry to me but I think it's just my eyes.
    Agree with you.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    This has been rejected for soft at 1400, but this is 1280, but wondering if there's some blur in the tail area. The text on the tail almost looks blurry to me but I think it's just my eyes.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Thought there was gonna be some heat haze here but I don't see any. Does the photo look okay, overall?
    Maybe a touch soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • jakerepp
    replied
    Thought there was gonna be some heat haze here but I don't see any. Does the photo look okay, overall?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by jakerepp View Post
    Identifiable face check. Are glasses enough to obscure?

    Also the Hughes heli, I feel like it's either too dark or contrasty. Pre-screen please
    Yes to motive and dark.

    Leave a comment:


  • TRTPUwU
    replied
    I’d say that the face is recognizable, but a screener might dissagree.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X