Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charlie Chang - editing/rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post
    I just got a photo rejected , but there are many simialr example of this type of photo in database
    Is it still possible to re-edit or appeal?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10583552

    Example in database:https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10639335
    Subjective decision for both.

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie Chang
    replied
    I just got a photo rejected , but there are many simialr example of this type of photo in database
    Is it still possible to re-edit or appeal?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10583552

    Example in database:https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10639335

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie Chang
    replied
    Due to VPN issue, my friend ask me post this photo for pre-screen, could anyone give any suggestion of this photo? Thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie Chang
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    If you decide not to wait for a reply in the forum and appeal, please delete your request so I don't waste time reading, considering, and composing a reply when your failed appeal tells you the same thing I would have.
    Sorry for forgot deleting message from the forum, I will notice this in the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Charlie Chang

    Again, thanks for your friendly advice of improving colour of this photo.
    The issue of color just been solved, but I don't understand why a new rejection just added of this photo, I am very surprised about it.
    If the rejection is correct, I think the screener who reject my photo first time should give me this rejection as well.
    Do you think this photo is worth appeal or not, I wish you could give me some advice about it, thank you very much.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10482675
    If you decide not to wait for a reply in the forum and appeal, please delete your request so I don't waste time reading, considering, and composing a reply when your failed appeal tells you the same thing I would have.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post

    Large thanks for your suggestion.
    I decreased the contrast of this photo, the contrast issue has been solved.
    But I don't understand I only changed the contrast of the photo but it causes further rejection.
    What is the standard of compression rejection, do this photo is still possible to fix to make it accepted?
    Link of the rejected photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10477084
    Should be fixable if you can find out what caused the patterns/banding in the sky.

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie Chang
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Contrast is a bit harsh.
    Large thanks for your suggestion.
    I decreased the contrast of this photo, the contrast issue has been solved.
    But I don't understand I only changed the contrast of the photo but it causes further rejection.
    What is the standard of compression rejection, do this photo is still possible to fix to make it accepted?
    Link of the rejected photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10477084

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post
    I am ready to appeal this photo because I think this photo was rejected by mistake,
    Is this photo really soft or not?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10472500
    Borderline for me, but soft enough for the two screeners who screened it. Not much chance of a successful appeal, imho.

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie Chang
    replied
    I am ready to appeal this photo because I think this photo was rejected by mistake,
    Is this photo really soft or not?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10472500

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie Chang
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    That was fast

    My mistake, if lacking a reg. shouldn't be considered hot. Sorry for the rejection I caused.
    No worries, everyone is possible to have mistakes.
    Thanks for your support to me with pre-screening my photos!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Might be some disagreement about that. I'll check with the rest of the crew and get back to you.
    That was fast

    My mistake, if lacking a reg. shouldn't be considered hot. Sorry for the rejection I caused.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post

    Thank you very much for pre-screening!
    Anyhow, the photo3 still rejected by Invalid Hot
    So, is it still possible to upload the photos that only know the serial number as hot in the future?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10505881

    In addition, I think even priority screening will not bring benefit to FR24, but I think this will bring benefit to JP's data list, many users use JP for searching aviation data and photos.
    Might be some disagreement about that. I'll check with the rest of the crew and get back to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie Chang
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. contrast, soft, compression
    2. borderline soft
    3. soft. yes hot.
    4. soft, dark/contrast
    5. borderline soft
    Thank you very much for pre-screening!
    Anyhow, the photo3 still rejected by Invalid Hot
    So, is it still possible to upload the photos that only know the serial number as hot in the future?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10505881

    In addition, I think even priority screening will not bring benefit to FR24, but I think this will bring benefit to JP's data list, many users use JP for searching aviation data and photos.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post
    Can anyone pre-screen these photos? Thanks!

    About photo 3, I know the serial number of this aircraft, but there is no Registration of this aircraft yet. Is photo 3 can consider as hot photo? Because there is no photo of this serial number and this aircraft in database.
    1. contrast, soft, compression
    2. borderline soft
    3. soft. yes hot.
    4. soft, dark/contrast
    5. borderline soft

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie Chang
    replied
    Can anyone pre-screen these photos? Thanks!

    About photo 3, I know the serial number of this aircraft, but there is no Registration of this aircraft yet. Is photo 3 can consider as hot photo? Because there is no photo of this serial number and this aircraft in database.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X