If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
rejection advice
I just got a photo rejected by rejection JPG compression artefacts
But I checked the size of this photo, the size is 565kb, I think the compression is okay.......
What is the standard of JPG compression artefacts? Photo size smaller than 600kb?
Link of rejected photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10368138
I hope someone could give me some advice of it, thanks!
rejection advice
I just got a photo rejected by rejection JPG compression artefacts
But I checked the size of this photo, the size is 565kb, I think the compression is okay.......
What is the standard of JPG compression artefacts? Photo size smaller than 600kb?
Link of rejected photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10368138
I hope someone could give me some advice of it, thanks!
Maybe a bit noisy, but there is no issue with compression. I've added the image.
1. soft, horizon
2. soft, contrast
3. ok for me.
4. borderline soft/contrast
5. ok for me
Thanks for your pre-screening!
I have questions about photo1 and 2.
What is the appropriate reference to make sure photo one not to be horizon unlevel?
Is it possible to be fixed (increase contrast) of photo 2?
Would you mind to answer my questions? thanks!
Thanks for your pre-screening!
I have questions about photo1 and 2.
What is the appropriate reference to make sure photo one not to be horizon unlevel?
Is it possible to be fixed (increase contrast) of photo 2?
Would you mind to answer my questions? thanks!
1. verticals in center of the frame appear to leaning a bit left
2. poor contrast due to overcast conditions. not sure more editing can help.
1. dirty
2. soft, contrast
3. ok for me
4. soft, borderline contrast
5. soft, overprocessed
Thank you very much for your pre-screening!
I remembered that I did not change highlight and shadow of picture 5.
And I did not see halo around the aircraft, if it is still overprocessed, is it possible to be re-edit to make this photo accept?
Thank you very much for your pre-screening!
I remembered that I did not change highlight and shadow of picture 5.
And I did not see halo around the aircraft, if it is still overprocessed, is it possible to be re-edit to make this photo accept?
If halos are caused by processing, then different/better processing should address the issue, yes.
Hello, I just received a photo got rejected, and I think it is unreasonable
Because according to JP rule, it should be accepted.
Link of rejected photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10429643
I read the guide of JP, it said :
The following will be accepted as hot for 48 hours after the first photo got accepted:
1. New aircraft type produced by a manufacturer. (including subtypes)
2. New aircraft type / subtype for an airline or air force. (including roll-outs or test flights at the factory)
My photo should be in 48h rule, but it doesn't.
Can anyone explain this? Thanks
Hello, I just received a photo got rejected, and I think it is unreasonable
Because according to JP rule, it should be accepted.
Link of rejected photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10429643
I read the guide of JP, it said :
The following will be accepted as hot for 48 hours after the first photo got accepted:
1. New aircraft type produced by a manufacturer. (including subtypes)
2. New aircraft type / subtype for an airline or air force. (including roll-outs or test flights at the factory)
My photo should be in 48h rule, but it doesn't.
Can anyone explain this? Thanks
Yes, it seems you uploaded it only 41 hours after the first one was accepted. I will add it.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment