Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charlie Chang - editing/rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post
    Can anyone pre-screen these photos?
    1. borderline soft/horizon
    2. ok for me
    3. soft
    4. horizon, borderline soft

    Comment


    • #47
      My friend has a photo that that he is very confused , and he can't post his photo to the forum due to VPN issue.
      Can anyone pre-screen his photo?
      Attached Files
      Kind regards from Shanghai
      Charlie Chang

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post
        My friend has a photo that that he is very confused , and he can't post his photo to the forum due to VPN issue.
        Can anyone pre-screen his photo?
        Image is heat hazed/soft.

        Comment


        • #49
          rejection advice
          I just got a photo rejected by rejection JPG compression artefacts
          But I checked the size of this photo, the size is 565kb, I think the compression is okay.......
          What is the standard of JPG compression artefacts? Photo size smaller than 600kb?
          Link of rejected photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10368138
          I hope someone could give me some advice of it, thanks!
          Kind regards from Shanghai
          Charlie Chang

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post
            rejection advice
            I just got a photo rejected by rejection JPG compression artefacts
            But I checked the size of this photo, the size is 565kb, I think the compression is okay.......
            What is the standard of JPG compression artefacts? Photo size smaller than 600kb?
            Link of rejected photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10368138
            I hope someone could give me some advice of it, thanks!
            Maybe a bit noisy, but there is no issue with compression. I've added the image.

            Comment


            • #51
              Can anyone pre-screen these photos? Thanks!
              Attached Files
              Kind regards from Shanghai
              Charlie Chang

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post
                Can anyone pre-screen these photos? Thanks!
                1. soft, horizon
                2. soft, contrast
                3. ok for me.
                4. borderline soft/contrast
                5. ok for me

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  1. soft, horizon
                  2. soft, contrast
                  3. ok for me.
                  4. borderline soft/contrast
                  5. ok for me
                  Thanks for your pre-screening!
                  I have questions about photo1 and 2.
                  What is the appropriate reference to make sure photo one not to be horizon unlevel?
                  Is it possible to be fixed (increase contrast) of photo 2?
                  Would you mind to answer my questions? thanks!
                  Kind regards from Shanghai
                  Charlie Chang

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post

                    Thanks for your pre-screening!
                    I have questions about photo1 and 2.
                    What is the appropriate reference to make sure photo one not to be horizon unlevel?
                    Is it possible to be fixed (increase contrast) of photo 2?
                    Would you mind to answer my questions? thanks!
                    1. verticals in center of the frame appear to leaning a bit left
                    2. poor contrast due to overcast conditions. not sure more editing can help.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Can anyone pre-screen these photos? Thanks!
                      Attached Files
                      Kind regards from Shanghai
                      Charlie Chang

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post
                        Can anyone pre-screen these photos? Thanks!
                        1. dirty
                        2. soft, contrast
                        3. ok for me
                        4. soft, borderline contrast
                        5. soft, overprocessed

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                          1. dirty
                          2. soft, contrast
                          3. ok for me
                          4. soft, borderline contrast
                          5. soft, overprocessed
                          Thank you very much for your pre-screening!
                          I remembered that I did not change highlight and shadow of picture 5.
                          And I did not see halo around the aircraft, if it is still overprocessed, is it possible to be re-edit to make this photo accept?
                          Kind regards from Shanghai
                          Charlie Chang

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post

                            Thank you very much for your pre-screening!
                            I remembered that I did not change highlight and shadow of picture 5.
                            And I did not see halo around the aircraft, if it is still overprocessed, is it possible to be re-edit to make this photo accept?
                            If halos are caused by processing, then different/better processing should address the issue, yes.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Hello, I just received a photo got rejected, and I think it is unreasonable
                              Because according to JP rule, it should be accepted.
                              Link of rejected photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10429643
                              I read the guide of JP, it said :
                              The following will be accepted as hot for 48 hours after the first photo got accepted:


                              1. New aircraft type produced by a manufacturer. (including subtypes)
                              2. New aircraft type / subtype for an airline or air force. (including roll-outs or test flights at the factory)

                              My photo should be in 48h rule, but it doesn't.
                              Can anyone explain this? Thanks
                              Kind regards from Shanghai
                              Charlie Chang

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Charlie Chang View Post
                                Hello, I just received a photo got rejected, and I think it is unreasonable
                                Because according to JP rule, it should be accepted.
                                Link of rejected photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10429643
                                I read the guide of JP, it said :
                                The following will be accepted as hot for 48 hours after the first photo got accepted:


                                1. New aircraft type produced by a manufacturer. (including subtypes)
                                2. New aircraft type / subtype for an airline or air force. (including roll-outs or test flights at the factory)

                                My photo should be in 48h rule, but it doesn't.
                                Can anyone explain this? Thanks
                                Yes, it seems you uploaded it only 41 hours after the first one was accepted. I will add it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X