Charlie Chang - editing/rejection advice

[Charlie Chang]

Rejection help:
I checked the file size of this photo, and I think from the perspective of size, this photo should be ok.
What is the method that screener use that to identify a photo has compression issue? Because the background of this photo is not sky, I have no idea of check for dust tool can help or not.

Link of the rejected photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10551756

[Charlie Chang]

Doesn't really seem blurry to me, but maybe it's in reference to the fact that it seems a bit out of focus towards the nose.

thank you very much!

[dlowwa]

Could anyone give me some suggestions of this photo
How to identify a photo blurry or not?
Link of the photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10587057
I used check for dust and original photo to check this photo again and again, I really have no idea why this photo is blurry.
Is there any new technique to identify a photo blurry or not.
Or my camera has some issue?
I wish someone could give me some advice of it. Thanks !

Doesn't really seem blurry to me, but maybe it's in reference to the fact that it seems a bit out of focus towards the nose.

[Charlie Chang]

Could anyone give me some suggestions of this photo
How to identify a photo blurry or not?
Link of the photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10587057
I used check for dust and original photo to check this photo again and again, I really have no idea why this photo is blurry.
Is there any new technique to identify a photo blurry or not.
Or my camera has some issue?
I wish someone could give me some advice of it. Thanks !

[dlowwa]

I just got a photo rejected , but there are many simialr example of this type of photo in database
Is it still possible to re-edit or appeal?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10583552

Example in database:https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10639335

Subjective decision for both.

[Charlie Chang]

I just got a photo rejected , but there are many simialr example of this type of photo in database
Is it still possible to re-edit or appeal?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10583552

Example in database:https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10639335

[Charlie Chang]

Due to VPN issue, my friend ask me post this photo for pre-screen, could anyone give any suggestion of this photo? Thanks

[Charlie Chang]

If you decide not to wait for a reply in the forum and appeal, please delete your request so I don't waste time reading, considering, and composing a reply when your failed appeal tells you the same thing I would have.

Sorry for forgot deleting message from the forum, I will notice this in the future.

[dlowwa]

Again, thanks for your friendly advice of improving colour of this photo.
The issue of color just been solved, but I don't understand why a new rejection just added of this photo, I am very surprised about it.
If the rejection is correct, I think the screener who reject my photo first time should give me this rejection as well.
Do you think this photo is worth appeal or not, I wish you could give me some advice about it, thank you very much.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10482675

If you decide not to wait for a reply in the forum and appeal, please delete your request so I don't waste time reading, considering, and composing a reply when your failed appeal tells you the same thing I would have.

[dlowwa]

Large thanks for your suggestion.
I decreased the contrast of this photo, the contrast issue has been solved.
But I don't understand I only changed the contrast of the photo but it causes further rejection.
What is the standard of compression rejection, do this photo is still possible to fix to make it accepted?
Link of the rejected photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10477084

Should be fixable if you can find out what caused the patterns/banding in the sky.

[Charlie Chang]

Contrast is a bit harsh.

Large thanks for your suggestion.
I decreased the contrast of this photo, the contrast issue has been solved.
But I don't understand I only changed the contrast of the photo but it causes further rejection.
What is the standard of compression rejection, do this photo is still possible to fix to make it accepted?
Link of the rejected photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10477084

[dlowwa]

I am ready to appeal this photo because I think this photo was rejected by mistake,
Is this photo really soft or not?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10472500

Borderline for me, but soft enough for the two screeners who screened it. Not much chance of a successful appeal, imho.

[Charlie Chang]

I am ready to appeal this photo because I think this photo was rejected by mistake,
Is this photo really soft or not?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10472500

[Charlie Chang]

That was fast

My mistake, if lacking a reg. shouldn't be considered hot. Sorry for the rejection I caused.

No worries, everyone is possible to have mistakes.
Thanks for your support to me with pre-screening my photos!

[dlowwa]

Might be some disagreement about that. I'll check with the rest of the crew and get back to you.

That was fast

My mistake, if lacking a reg. shouldn't be considered hot. Sorry for the rejection I caused.