Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kaarel Velgre - Prescreening / Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • KaarelVelgre
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. borderline soft (ok for me)
    2. soft/heat hazed
    Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KaarelVelgre View Post
    Hi! Could I get these 2 photos prescreened, please:
    1. borderline soft (ok for me)
    2. soft/heat hazed

    Leave a comment:


  • KaarelVelgre
    replied

    Hi! Could I get these 2 photos prescreened, please:
    1)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9146-6.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	645.9 KB
ID:	1148958
    2)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1424-5.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	924.6 KB
ID:	1148957
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KaarelVelgre View Post

    Hi, is it any better now?
    Better, yes. Couldn't say acceptable for sure, but it would have a chance.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    My mistake - I looked at them the wrong way round

    Leave a comment:


  • KaarelVelgre
    replied
    Originally posted by MarkLawrence View Post
    It was okay for Dana before
    No, she said that it had too much noise reduction

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    It was okay for Dana before

    Leave a comment:


  • KaarelVelgre
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. overprocessed (too much noise reduction)
    2. ok for me
    Hi, is it any better now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5442-3.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	681.5 KB
ID:	1146767

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KaarelVelgre View Post
    Hi over a long time!
    Would those photos be acceptable for Jp?
    1. overprocessed (too much noise reduction)
    2. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • KaarelVelgre
    replied
    Originally posted by MarkLawrence View Post
    however, that MRTT image - is incredible!! Great shot!!
    Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    I am not a screener, and I would hate to steer in the wrong direction - I'm sure a screener or crew member will comment - however, that MRTT image - is incredible!! Great shot!!

    Leave a comment:


  • KaarelVelgre
    replied
    Hi over a long time!
    Would those photos be acceptable for Jp?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5442.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	627.1 KB
ID:	1146478

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4513.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	280.6 KB
ID:	1146477
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KaarelVelgre View Post
    Hello! Could you give me some advice on this photo:
    Would it be rejected for overprocessing and are there any other issues with this photo?
    Thanks a lot!
    Contrast is a bit strong but otherwise would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • KaarelVelgre
    replied
    Hello! Could you give me some advice on this photo:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0066-5.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	952.3 KB
ID:	1142413
    Would it be rejected for overprocessing and are there any other issues with this photo?
    Thanks a lot!

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Well you blurred the faces to avoid issues about it right ?

    So if you don't blur the faces, it's a clear motive rejection,
    ...
    so why would it need to add the obstruction rejection reason ?

    And yes, we all know that sometimes we don't get there right conditions to be able to upload a photo. Happened to all of us in the past and will happen again in the futur, it's just part of the hobby.

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X