Kaarel Velgre - Prescreening / Editing advice

[KaarelVelgre]

however, that MRTT image - is incredible!! Great shot!!

Thank you!

[MarkLawrence]

I am not a screener, and I would hate to steer in the wrong direction - I'm sure a screener or crew member will comment - however, that MRTT image - is incredible!! Great shot!!

[KaarelVelgre]

Hi over a long time!
Would those photos be acceptable for Jp?

[dlowwa]

Hello! Could you give me some advice on this photo:
Would it be rejected for overprocessing and are there any other issues with this photo?
Thanks a lot!

Contrast is a bit strong but otherwise would be ok for me.

[KaarelVelgre]

Hello! Could you give me some advice on this photo:

Would it be rejected for overprocessing and are there any other issues with this photo?
Thanks a lot!

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Well you blurred the faces to avoid issues about it right ?

So if you don't blur the faces, it's a clear motive rejection,
...
so why would it need to add the obstruction rejection reason ?

And yes, we all know that sometimes we don't get there right conditions to be able to upload a photo. Happened to all of us in the past and will happen again in the futur, it's just part of the hobby.

Regards
Alex

[dlowwa]

Hi! Could I have these 3 photos prescreened, please. I know I've already asked prescreening earlier for similar images, but these 3 look a bit heat hazed for me, so I just wanted me make sure if they are okay, in terms of sharpening.

Yes, all three badly heat hazed/compressed, no chance at 1920pix.

[KaarelVelgre]

Hi! Could I have these 3 photos prescreened, please. I know I've already asked prescreening earlier for similar images, but these 3 look a bit heat hazed for me, so I just wanted me make sure if they are okay, in terms of sharpening. Thank you as always!

[KaarelVelgre]

First of all, I'm so sorry that it created a new thread for that question, I didn't know that this should also go under my prescreening request thread. I've read these prescreening guidelines a dozen times, but I still didn't know that.

And about your TU-134 digital manipulation, yes blurring faces is not allowed. People were a clear motive and obstruction rejection there. As you see other people's photo of that plane (mine included) are all done without people around.

Hope it helps
Alex

So even if the faces aren't blurred, the photo wouldn't still be acceptable, because of obstruction?
Why didn't the screener add this reason too then?
And, I did the shot on the day when the Aviation Days took place, and I'ld say there were thousands of people around. All the other shots are done when there weren't that much people. I hope you understand what I'm saying here
Sorry for wasting your time.

[Alex - Spot-This !]

And about your TU-134 digital manipulation, yes blurring faces is not allowed. People were a clear motive and obstruction rejection there. As you see other people's photo of that plane (mine included) are all done without people around.

Hope it helps
Alex

[dlowwa]

Thanks! Do you think 1-3 would be fixable?

1-2, definitely not. 3 perhaps.

[KaarelVelgre]

1-3. contrast
4. soft
5. borderline overexposed

Thanks! Do you think 1-3 would be fixable?

[dlowwa]

Hi, could I get these photos prescreened, please:

1-3. contrast
4. soft
5. borderline overexposed

[KaarelVelgre]

Hi, could I get these photos prescreened, please:

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

I'm trying out uploading in 1920px size, I hope that the sharpness and everything is okay.
Best regards!

[dlowwa]

Okay, I tried to fix the hoirizon, hope they're all right now:

1-2 ok for me
3. borderline horizon
4. horizon, borderline overexposed/harsh contrast (sorry didn't mention before)